Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 25, 2025

Comparison of Agreement and Accuracy using Binocular Wavefront Optometer with Autorefractor and Phoropter
Published on: September 16, 2025
Do visual performance and optical quality vary across different contact lens correction modalities in keratoconus?
Preetam Kumar1, Praveen K Bandela2, Shrikant R Bharadwaj2
1Bausch & Lomb Contact Lens Centre, L V Prasad Eye Institute, Road No. 2, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad, 500034, Telangana, India; Bausch and Lomb School of Optometry, Brien Holden Institute of Optometry and Vision Sciences, L V Prasad Eye Institute, Road No. 2, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad, 500034, Telangana, India.
Advanced contact lens designs offer some visual improvement for keratoconus patients, but performance varies by lens type and disease severity. Non-visual factors may influence lens choice more than sophisticated design.
Area of Science:
- Ophthalmology
- Optometry
- Vision Science
Background:
- Keratoconus is a progressive eye condition affecting corneal shape.
- Several advanced contact lens (CL) designs exist for vision correction in keratoconus.
- Comparative data on the visual performance of these CL designs is limited.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate and compare the visual performance and optical quality of different advanced contact lens designs in keratoconus patients.
- To test if CL designs have a differential impact on visual outcomes based on keratoconus severity.
Main Methods:
- Prospective, crossover study involving 28 keratoconus patients and 10 controls.
- Measured spatial vision (acuity, contrast sensitivity), depth vision (stereoacuity), and optical quality (wavefront aberrations).
- Compared spectacles, conventional RGP, Kerasoft®, Rose K2®, and Scleral RGP® CLs.
Main Results:
- Visual outcomes deteriorated with keratoconus severity but improved with CL wear compared to spectacles.
- Kerasoft CL showed smaller improvements; other designs showed comparable, higher improvements.
- No CL correction modality achieved control-level visual function or optical quality.
Conclusions:
- Advanced CL designs do not uniformly improve visual performance and optical quality across keratoconus severity.
- Non-visual factors like fit, comfort, and cost may be more critical in CL selection for keratoconus than design sophistication.
More Related Videos
07:29Three Different Protocols of Corneal Collagen Crosslinking in Keratoconus: Conventional, Accelerated and Iontophoresis
Published on: November 12, 2015
05:46Author Spotlight: Advancements in Refractive Surgical Correction for Presbyopia and Exploring Postoperative Visual Acuity
Published on: September 20, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Focusing of Light in the Eye
Angle Closure Glaucoma: Treatment
Open Angle Glaucoma: Treatment
Drugs such as carbonic anhydrase inhibitors, α2- and...