Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 25, 2025

Concept Development and Use of an Automated Food Intake and Eating Behavior Assessment Method
Published on: February 19, 2021
Approaches to Eating and Drinking with Acknowledged Risk: A Systematic Review
Naomi Soar1,2, Jonathan Birns3,4, Peter Sommerville3,4
1Department of Speech and Language Therapy, St Thomas' Hospital, Westminster Bridge Road, London, SE1 7EH, UK. Naomi.Soar@gstt.nhs.uk.
Background:
Patients with dysphagia may consider eating and drinking with acknowledged risk (EDAR) instead of artificial hydration/nutrition. Timely consideration of complex issues is required including dysphagia reversibility, risk/benefit discussions, patient wishes, their capacity and best interests.
Objective:
This study aimed to establish if EDAR protocols improve care through a systematic literature review with a secondary aim to explore important factors for the development and success of a protocol.
Methods:
PUBMED, MEDLINE, CINAHL and EMBASE were searched for English language articles to May 2019 with terms related to EDAR, dysphagia and end of life. Articles were agreed for inclusion by three independent reviewers. Levels of evidence were assessed using the modified Sackett scale. Study themes were identified and discussed.
Results:
8 articles met the inclusion criteria with varied methodology. The highest level of evidence was III (cohort study). Most were limited to patients with dementia, stroke, in older person's wards or residential homes. Three articles described a systematic approach to EDAR for in-patients, reporting reductions in days nil-by-mouth until feeding plans are made and improvements in documentation of decision making, nutrition plans and capacity assessment. Five papers explored the views and knowledge of staff, patients and families/carers relating to EDAR and complex feeding decisions. Formal meta-analysis was not possible due to the level and mix of methodology.
Conclusion:
There is a paucity of evidence to determine if EDAR protocols improve care. However, support is emerging for a coordinated approach to managing EDAR. Findings suggest having a protocol is not enough; training and communication within teams is essential, together with incorporating feedback from patients and carers, and this justifies further work.
Related Concept Videos
Binge Eating Disorders
Stress Prevention and Stress Management Techniques IV
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Taste Buds and Receptors
Regulation of Food Intake
Cancer Prevention
Some...

