Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 25, 2025

The Goeckerman Regimen for the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Psoriasis
Published on: July 11, 2013
Baseline characteristics of patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis according to previous systemic treatment
M Augustin1, E Dauden2, U Mrowietz3
1Institute for Health Services Research in Dermatology and Nursing (IVDP), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Introduction:
Psoriatic disease is associated with considerable impairment of Quality of Life (QoL). The PROSE study (NCT02752776) examined the impact of secukinumab on patient-reported outcomes in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis (PsO) stratified by previous exposure to systemic treatment.
Methods:
In this prospective, non-randomized, multicentre study, patients were categorized at baseline according to previous exposure to systemic treatment: naïve [naïve to any systemic treatment (N = 663)], conventional systemic [previously exposed to ≥1 conventional systemic therapy (N = 673)] and biologics [previously exposed to ≥1 biologic (N = 324)]. Baseline demographics including age, gender, race, body weight and body mass index, disease characteristics and patient-reported QoL outcomes [Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), Family DLQI (F-DLQI)] of patients enrolled in the study are reported here.
Results:
Baseline demographic characteristics were well balanced across the three subpopulations. Naïve patients had a shorter time since diagnosis (15.5 ± 12.1 years) compared with the conventional systemic (19.1 ± 12.5 years) and biologic patients (23.0 ± 12.5 years), and lower rates of psoriatic arthritis (6.6% vs. 17.4% and 27.8%, respectively). Metabolic syndrome (37.6-43.5%), obesity (16.9-19.1%), hyperlipidaemia (15.3-21.9%) and diabetes mellitus (6.8-14.2%) were reported at numerically higher rate in the biologic group. The mean PASI (19.7 ± 7.9), affected Body Surface Area (28.2 ± 15.3%) as well as the Investigator Global Assessment score (patients with score 4: 33.7%) indicated severe disease at baseline and were comparable for the three groups. QoL impairment was evident from mean DLQI (14.1 ± 7.1: naïve = 13.5 ± 6.8; conventional systemic = 14.3 ± 7.0; biologic = 14.8 ± 7.7) and mean F-DLQI (11.5 ± 7.0: naïve = 11.3 ± 7.1; conventional systemic = 11.4 ± 6.7; biologic = 12.1 ± 7.7) also indicated derangement of QoL of patients and their families.
Conclusion:
Patients naïve to systemic treatment had shorter disease journey compared with patients previously exposed to systemic treatments; despite this, the severe impact of disease on patient and family QoL outcomes can be as apparent in naïve patients as in systemically treated patients at baseline.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...

