Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Mouse Models of Cancer Study02:43

Mouse Models of Cancer Study

6.3K
Mice have long served as models for studying human biology and pathology because of their phylogenetic and physiological similarity with humans. They are also easy to maintain and breed in the laboratory, and hence, many inbred strains are now available for research. Studies on mice have contributed immeasurably to our understanding of cancer biology.
The development of transgenic, knockout, and knock-in mice has led to an exponential increase in their use as model organisms in research,...
6.3K
Cancer Survival Analysis01:21

Cancer Survival Analysis

588
Cancer survival analysis focuses on quantifying and interpreting the time from a key starting point, such as diagnosis or the initiation of treatment, to a specific endpoint, such as remission or death. This analysis provides critical insights into treatment effectiveness and factors that influence patient outcomes, helping to shape clinical decisions and guide prognostic evaluations. A cornerstone of oncology research, survival analysis tackles the challenges of skewed, non-normally...
588
Cancer-Critical Genes I: Proto-oncogenes01:33

Cancer-Critical Genes I: Proto-oncogenes

11.0K
Genes usually encode proteins necessary for the proper functioning of a healthy cell. Mutations can often cause changes to the gene expression pattern, thereby altering the phenotype.
When the function of certain critical genes, especially those involved in cell cycle regulation and cell growth signaling cascades, gets disrupted, it upsets the cell cycle progression. Such cells with unchecked cell cycles start proliferating uncontrollably and eventually develop into tumors.
Such genes that act...
11.0K
Adaptive Mechanisms in Cancer Cells02:53

Adaptive Mechanisms in Cancer Cells

6.8K
Cancer cells accumulate genetic changes at an abnormally rapid rate due to the defects in the DNA repair mechanisms. From an evolutionary perspective, such genetic instability is advantageous for cancer development. Mutant cell lines accumulate a series of beneficial mutations that contribute to their progression into cancer.
Some of the advantages that cancer cells have on normal cells include - enhanced ability to divide without terminally differentiating, induce new blood vessel formation,...
6.8K
Cancer-Critical Genes II: Tumor Suppressor Genes01:05

Cancer-Critical Genes II: Tumor Suppressor Genes

9.3K
Genes usually encode proteins necessary for the proper functioning of a healthy cell. Mutations can often cause changes to the gene expression pattern, thereby altering the phenotype.
When the function of certain critical genes, especially those involved in cell cycle regulation and cell growth signaling cascades, gets disrupted, it upsets the cell cycle progression. Such cells with unchecked cell cycles start proliferating uncontrollably and eventually develop into tumors.
Such genes that act...
9.3K
Cancers Originate from Somatic Mutations in a Single Cell02:21

Cancers Originate from Somatic Mutations in a Single Cell

14.4K
Cancer arises from mutations in the critical genes that allow healthy cells to escape cell cycle regulation and acquire the ability to proliferate indefinitely. Though originating from a single mutation event in one of the originator cells, cancer progresses when the mutant cell lines continue to gain more and more mutations, and finally, become malignant. For example, chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) develops initially as a non-lethal increase in white blood cells, which progressively...
14.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

MetaphorPrompt2-A Structure and Function-Focused Approach for Extracting Causal Events from Biological Text.

Computational and structural biotechnology journal·2026
Same author

ST2HE: enhancing spatial transcriptomics interpretability via virtual staining for histological annotation.

Briefings in bioinformatics·2026
Same author

Revealing the genetic regulation of wood traits and secondary cell wall development in <i>Ginkgo biloba</i>: an integrated analysis from the perspectives of GWAS, TWAS, and WGCNA.

Horticulture research·2026
Same author

Distinct and shared synergistic effects of high-fat and high-iron diets on liver tumorigenesis and transcriptomic remodeling in mice.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Role of Bevacizumab in Multiple Glioblastomas: A Retrospective Single-Center Analysis.

Neurosciences (Riyadh, Saudi Arabia)·2026
Same author

spatiAlytica: Viewer-Grounded Multimodal Agentic System for Interactive Spatial Omics Analysis.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 25, 2025

Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model
07:15

Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model

Published on: August 16, 2020

7.3K

Convolutional neural network models for cancer type prediction based on gene expression.

Milad Mostavi1,2, Yu-Chiao Chiu1, Yufei Huang3,4

  • 1Greehey Children's Cancer Research Institute, University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, 78229, USA.

BMC Medical Genomics
|April 4, 2020
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces novel Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) models for accurate cancer type prediction using gene expression data, identifying key cancer markers while accounting for tissue origin effects.

Keywords:
Breast cancer subtype predictionCancer gene markersCancer type predictionConvolutional neural networksDeep learningThe Cancer Genome Atlas

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Impact of Intergenic Interactions on Disease-Identifying Dark Biomarkers
03:37

Author Spotlight: Impact of Intergenic Interactions on Disease-Identifying Dark Biomarkers

Published on: March 1, 2024

1.2K
Predictive Immune Modeling of Solid Tumors
08:50

Predictive Immune Modeling of Solid Tumors

Published on: February 25, 2020

7.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 25, 2025

Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model
07:15

Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model

Published on: August 16, 2020

7.3K
Author Spotlight: Impact of Intergenic Interactions on Disease-Identifying Dark Biomarkers
03:37

Author Spotlight: Impact of Intergenic Interactions on Disease-Identifying Dark Biomarkers

Published on: March 1, 2024

1.2K
Predictive Immune Modeling of Solid Tumors
08:50

Predictive Immune Modeling of Solid Tumors

Published on: February 25, 2020

7.4K

Area of Science:

  • Genomics
  • Bioinformatics
  • Machine Learning

Background:

  • Accurate cancer type prediction is crucial for diagnosis and treatment.
  • Identifying cancer marker genes is a key challenge in cancer research.
  • Existing machine learning models may be biased by the tissue of origin.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and evaluate Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) models for predicting cancer types from gene expression profiles.
  • To identify cancer marker genes by interpreting the CNN models, accounting for tissue of origin.
  • To assess the models' performance in classifying tumor vs. non-tumor samples and predicting cancer subtypes.

Main Methods:

  • Implemented three CNN models (1D-CNN, 2D-Vanilla-CNN, 2D-Hybrid-CNN) using gene expression data.
  • Trained and tested models on 10,340 samples from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) across 33 cancer types and normal tissues.
  • Utilized a guided saliency technique for model interpretation to identify cancer markers.

Main Results:

  • Achieved high prediction accuracies (93.9-95.0%) for classifying 34 classes (33 cancers + normal).
  • Identified 2090 potential cancer markers (average 108 per class) using the 1D-CNN model.
  • Successfully predicted breast cancer subtypes with 88.42% accuracy and identified known markers like GATA3 and ESR1.

Conclusions:

  • Novel CNN designs enable accurate, simultaneous prediction of cancer/normal status and cancer types.
  • The model interpretation scheme effectively identifies biologically relevant cancer markers, mitigating tissue-of-origin bias.
  • The proposed models are adaptable for future cancer diagnosis applications due to their efficient training.