Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 25, 2025

Large Scale Non-targeted Metabolomic Profiling of Serum by Ultra Performance Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry UPLC-MS
Published on: March 14, 2013
Quantification for non-targeted LC/MS screening without standard substances.
Jaanus Liigand1, Tingting Wang2, Joshua Kellogg3
1Institute of Chemistry, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Tartu, Ravila 14A, 50411, Tartu, Estonia.
Quantifying compounds from liquid chromatography/electrospray/high-resolution mass spectrometry (LC/ESI/HRMS) data without standards is now possible. A novel random forest regression approach accurately predicts compound responses and concentrations, enabling reliable analysis.
Area of Science:
- Analytical Chemistry
- Environmental Science
- Food Safety
Background:
- Non-targeted and suspect analyses using liquid chromatography/electrospray/high-resolution mass spectrometry (LC/ESI/HRMS) are crucial for identifying numerous compounds in complex samples.
- Quantifying these identified compounds accurately without authentic standards presents a significant analytical challenge.
- Existing methods often require costly and time-consuming standard preparation for each analyte.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and validate a novel computational approach for quantifying compounds identified via LC/ESI/HRMS, even in the absence of reference standards.
- To assess the accuracy and transferability of predicted compound responses across different analytical instruments.
- To enable reliable concentration estimations for environmental and food safety applications.
Main Methods:
- Utilized random forest regression to predict the electrospray ionization (ESI)/high-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS) response of compounds.
- Developed a regression-based method for transferring predicted responses between different LC/ESI/HRMS instruments.
- Applied predicted responses to estimate compound concentrations in real-world samples without using authentic standards.
Main Results:
- Achieved a mean error of 2.2 (positive mode) and 2.0 (negative mode) times for predicted ESI/HRMS responses.
- Demonstrated successful transferability of predicted responses across different instruments.
- Validated the approach by quantifying pesticides and mycotoxins in cereal samples with an average quantification error of 5.4 times, compatible with toxicological predictions.
Conclusions:
- The developed random forest regression approach provides a robust method for quantifying compounds from LC/ESI/HRMS data without authentic standards.
- The predicted responses are instrument-transferable, enhancing the method's practical applicability.
- This technique offers a viable solution for accurate compound quantification in food safety and environmental monitoring, aligning with the accuracy needed for effect predictions.
More Related Videos
09:04Identifying Per- and Polyfluorinated Chemical Species with a Combined Targeted and Non-Targeted-Screening High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry Workflow
Published on: April 18, 2019
11:00Untargeted Metabolomics from Biological Sources Using Ultraperformance Liquid Chromatography-High Resolution Mass Spectrometry UPLC-HRMS
Published on: May 20, 2013