Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Confidence Intervals01:21

Confidence Intervals

9.8K
An unbiased point estimate is often insufficient to predict a population estimate, such as population mean or population proportion. In this scenario, a confidence interval is used. A confidence interval is an estimate similar to a  sample proportion. However, unlike the point estimate which is a single value, the confidence interval  contains a range of values. These values have lower and upper limits, known as confidence limits, and can be designated as L1 and L2, respectively.
A...
9.8K
Interpretation of Confidence Intervals01:19

Interpretation of Confidence Intervals

9.0K
A confidence interval is a better estimate of the population than a point estimate, as it uses a range of values from a sample instead of a single value.
Confidence intervals have confidence coefficients that are crucial for their interpretation. The most common confidence coefficients are 0.90, 0.95, and 0.99, which can be written as percentages–90%, 95%, and 99%, respectively.
Suppose a person calculates a confidence interval with a confidence coefficient of 0.95. In that case, they can...
9.0K
Confidence Coefficient01:24

Confidence Coefficient

10.1K
The confidence coefficient is also known as the confidence level or degree of confidence. It is the percent expression for the probability, 1-α, that the confidence interval contains the true population parameter assuming that the confidence interval is obtained after sufficient unbiased sampling; for example, if the CL = 90%, then in 90 out of 100 samples the interval estimate will enclose the true population parameter. Here α is the area under the curve, distributed equally under...
10.1K
Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals00:54

Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals

9.8K
The confidence interval is the range of values around the mean that contains the true mean. It is expressed as a probability percentage. The interpretation of a 95% confidence interval, for instance, is that the statistician is 95% confident that the true mean falls within the interval. The upper and lower limits of this range are known as confidence limits. The confidence limits for the true mean are estimated from the sample's mean, the standard deviation, and the statistical factor...
9.8K
Confidence Interval for Estimating Population Mean01:25

Confidence Interval for Estimating Population Mean

8.7K
A point estimate of the population mean is obtained from a single sample. Such a point estimate does not represent a population well because it needs to account for variability in the population. Single point estimate can also be biased despite the sample being selected randomly. Thus, a point estimate is often unreliable. A confidence interval is needed to reduce this unreliability.
A confidence interval for the mean is a range of values that provides an estimate of the population mean. As the...
8.7K
Testing a Claim about Population Proportion01:24

Testing a Claim about Population Proportion

3.8K
A complete procedure for testing a claim about a population proportion is provided here.
There are two methods of testing a claim about a population proportion: (1) Using the sample proportion from the data where a binomial distribution is approximated to the normal distribution and (2) Using the binomial probabilities calculated from the data.
The first method uses normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution. The requirements are as follows: sample size is large...
3.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Statistical models for Alzheimer's disease clinical trials: Lessons learned from the DIAN-TU Platform Trial.

Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD·2026
Same author

Penalized estimation of linear transformation models for interval-censored data with time-dependent covariates.

Statistical methods in medical research·2026
Same author

Likelihood ratio test for the disease progression model to measure saved time in Alzheimer's disease.

Statistical methods in medical research·2026
Same author

Adaptive sample size re-estimation designs for a two-stage randomized trial with binary outcome.

Statistical methods in medical research·2025
Same author

Response to Letter to the Editor "Comments on 'Novel Non-Linear Models for Clinical Trial Analysis With Longitudinal Data: A Tutorial Using SAS for Both Frequentist and Bayesian Methods'".

Statistics in medicine·2025
Same author

Disease progression from mild cognitive impairment to dementia for patients with Alzheimer's disease or Lewy body pathology.

Journal of Alzheimer's disease reports·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 25, 2025

Assessment and Communication for People with Disorders of Consciousness
07:37

Assessment and Communication for People with Disorders of Consciousness

Published on: August 1, 2017

9.5K

Accurate confidence intervals for proportion in studies with clustered binary outcome.

Guogen Shan1

  • 1Epidemiology and Biostatistics Program, School of Public Health, University of Nevada Las Vegas, Las Vegas, NV, USA.

Statistical Methods in Medical Research
|April 4, 2020
PubMed
Summary

New importance sampling methods improve confidence interval accuracy for clustered binary data in medical research. These accurate intervals offer better coverage than traditional methods, especially with small sample sizes.

Keywords:
Clustered binary dataconfidence intervalimportance samplingintraclass correlation coefficientproportion

More Related Videos

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.4K
Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
04:57

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Published on: October 23, 2020

10.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 25, 2025

Assessment and Communication for People with Disorders of Consciousness
07:37

Assessment and Communication for People with Disorders of Consciousness

Published on: August 1, 2017

9.5K
An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.4K
Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
04:57

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Published on: October 23, 2020

10.7K

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Medical Research Methodology
  • Statistical Inference

Background:

  • Clustered binary data are prevalent in medical studies, presenting unique statistical challenges.
  • Traditional asymptotic methods for confidence intervals exhibit poor coverage with small sample sizes or boundary proportions.
  • Exact methods like Buehler's intervals are computationally intensive for clustered data.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and evaluate accurate confidence intervals for clustered binary data using importance sampling.
  • To address the limitations of traditional asymptotic methods in medical research settings.
  • To provide a computationally feasible and reliable method for interval estimation.

Main Methods:

  • Proposed importance sampling technique for calculating confidence intervals.
  • Conducted extensive simulation studies to compare interval performance.
  • Evaluated coverage probabilities of new intervals against existing asymptotic and exact methods.
  • Utilized asymptotic Wilson score for sample space ordering.

Main Results:

  • The proposed importance sampling method, particularly with the asymptotic Wilson score, significantly improved coverage probability.
  • New intervals demonstrated superior performance compared to traditional asymptotic intervals.
  • The new intervals offer reliable coverage, even in challenging scenarios like small sample sizes.

Conclusions:

  • Importance sampling provides accurate confidence intervals for clustered binary data in medical research.
  • The recommended method offers a practical solution for improving statistical inference in such studies.
  • These findings advocate for the adoption of importance sampling for more reliable confidence interval calculations.