Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

335
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
335
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model01:15

Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model

792
The case management model is a multidisciplinary approach that involves healthcare professionals from diverse disciplines, such as physicians, nurses, therapists, social workers, and pharmacists, working collaboratively to address the various needs of patients. Each healthcare professional brings unique expertise and perspectives, contributing to a more comprehensive understanding of the patient's condition and tailoring treatment plans accordingly.
For example, a patient with a chronic...
792
Relative Risk01:12

Relative Risk

1.6K
Relative risk (RR) is a statistical measure commonly used in epidemiology to compare the likelihood of a particular event occurring between two groups. This metric is important for evaluating the relationship between exposure to a specific risk factor and the probability of a particular outcome. It plays a crucial role in medical research, public health studies, and risk assessment. Relative risk quantifies how much more (or less) likely an event is to occur in an exposed group compared to an...
1.6K
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System VI: Calcium -Scoring CT01:25

Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System VI: Calcium -Scoring CT

298
Calcium-Scoring CT ScanA calcium-scoring CT scan, also known as coronary artery calcium (CAC) scan, detects calcium deposits in the coronary arteries. This test assesses the risk of coronary artery disease (CAD), which can lead to cardiovascular events such as angina, heart failure, and sudden cardiac arrest.A calcium-scoring CT scan is generally recommended for individuals at intermediate risk of CAD without symptoms. It includes:Men aged 40-75 and women aged 50-75: Especially those with a...
298
Healthcare Associated Infections II: Preventive Measures01:22

Healthcare Associated Infections II: Preventive Measures

3.5K
Essential infection prevention measures are based on the knowledge of the infection chain, the modes of transmission in healthcare settings, and the use of the best practices in all healthcare settings. Compulsory public reporting of healthcare-associated infection rates is needed to allow individuals and the community to make informed choices regarding selecting a healthcare facility.
The best practices for preventing healthcare-associated infections include hand hygiene, patient risk...
3.5K
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

300
Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
300

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Data-augmented multistate modeling for chronic disease processes using cross-sectional studies: application to HPV and cervical precancer.

Biostatistics (Oxford, England)·2026
Same author

Moving From Individualized Risk-Based Prevention to Benefit-Based Prevention: Estimating Individualized Life-Years Gained From Prevention Services as a Basis for Eligibility.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same author

Evaluation of Alternative Smoking Duration Criteria for Lung Cancer Screening.

JAMA internal medicine·2026
Same author

Increasing power and robustness in screening trials by testing stored specimens in the control arm.

BMC medical research methodology·2026
Same author

Benefits and Harms of Immediate Versus Delayed Treatment of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 2 : A Target Trial Emulation.

Annals of internal medicine·2026
Same author

Cessation of Betel Quid Chewing, Smoking, and Alcohol Drinking and Risk of Oral Precancer and Oral Cancer.

JCO global oncology·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 25, 2025

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.4K

2019 ASCCP Risk-Based Management Consensus Guidelines: Methods for Risk Estimation, Recommended Management, and

Li C Cheung1, Didem Egemen1, Xiaojian Chen1

  • 1Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD.

Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease
|April 4, 2020
PubMed
Summary

The 2019 ASCCP guidelines use risk assessment for managing cervical screening abnormalities, ensuring effective clinical action for precancer and cancer prevention. These risk-based recommendations were validated across diverse patient data for broad applicability.

More Related Videos

Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack
07:31

Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack

Published on: May 15, 2020

7.4K
Hydra, a Computer-Based Platform for Aiding Clinicians in Cardiovascular Analysis and Diagnosis
07:51

Hydra, a Computer-Based Platform for Aiding Clinicians in Cardiovascular Analysis and Diagnosis

Published on: September 26, 2018

7.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 25, 2025

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.4K
Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack
07:31

Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack

Published on: May 15, 2020

7.4K
Hydra, a Computer-Based Platform for Aiding Clinicians in Cardiovascular Analysis and Diagnosis
07:51

Hydra, a Computer-Based Platform for Aiding Clinicians in Cardiovascular Analysis and Diagnosis

Published on: September 26, 2018

7.9K

Area of Science:

  • Gynecology
  • Oncology
  • Public Health

Background:

  • Cervical cancer screening aims to detect precancerous lesions and cancer early.
  • Current management guidelines are evolving to incorporate risk stratification.
  • The 2019 ASCCP guidelines represent a shift towards risk-based clinical decision-making.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To detail the methodology for estimating cervical precancer and cancer risk.
  • To outline the process of developing risk-based management recommendations for abnormal cervical screening results.
  • To validate the generalizability of these risk-based management strategies.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a large dataset of 1.5 million patients from Kaiser Permanente Northern California (2003-2017) undergoing triennial cotesting.
  • Estimated risk profiles based on combinations of human papillomavirus (HPV) and cytology test results.
  • Validated management recommendations against risk estimates from external data sources.

Main Results:

  • Developed risk and management tables based on extensive patient data.
  • Demonstrated that risk-based management derived from the study cohort aligned with findings from external data sources.
  • Confirmed the consistency of risk-based management across different datasets.

Conclusions:

  • The 2019 ASCCP guidelines provide a framework for managing abnormal cervical screening results using a risk-based approach.
  • The described methods offer a foundation for future enhancements and extensions of these risk-based guidelines.
  • This approach facilitates standardized and effective management of cervical abnormalities.