Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Microsoft Excel: Pearson's Correlation01:18

Microsoft Excel: Pearson's Correlation

1.8K
Microsoft Excel is a powerful tool for statistical analysis, including calculating Pearson's correlation coefficient, which measures the strength and direction of a linear relationship between two continuous variables. Pearson's correlation coefficient, often denoted as "r," ranges from -1 to 1. A value close to 1 indicates a strong positive correlation, meaning as one variable increases, the other does too. A value close to -1 indicates a strong negative correlation, implying...
1.8K
Spearman's Rank Correlation Test01:20

Spearman's Rank Correlation Test

1.3K
Spearman's rank correlation test, also known as Spearman's rho, is a nonparametric method for assessing the strength and direction of association between two variables. This test is particularly valuable when the data distribution is unknown or when the assumption of normality does not hold. Named after the English psychologist and statistician Dr. Charles Edward Spearman, it serves as the nonparametric counterpart to Pearson's correlation coefficient.
Spearman's test calculates correlation by...
1.3K
Assessment of radial pulse01:11

Assessment of radial pulse

1.2K
Assessment of Radial Pulse
The radial pulse, located at the wrist, is often the preferred site for assessing peripheral pulse because of its accessibility and dependability. The process of determining the radial pulse involves several steps:
1.2K
Nursing Evaluation01:15

Nursing Evaluation

4.1K
The evaluation stage signals the end of the nursing process. The nurse gathers evaluative data to assess whether or not the patient has attained the expected results. Whereas the nurse collects data in the nursing assessment to identify the patient's health concerns, the evaluation stage data determines if the indicated health issues are resolved. Evaluative data collection includes two sections: the data acquired to evaluate patient outcomes and the time criteria for data collection.
4.1K
Calculating and Interpreting the Linear Correlation Coefficient01:11

Calculating and Interpreting the Linear Correlation Coefficient

7.5K
The correlation coefficient, r, developed by Karl Pearson in the early 1900s, is numerical and provides a measure of strength and direction of the linear association between the independent variable, x, and the dependent variable, y. Hence, it is also known as the Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient. It can be calculated using the following equation:
7.5K
McNemar's Test01:23

McNemar's Test

731
McNemar's Test is a nonparametric statistical test used to determine if there is a significant difference in proportions between two related groups when the outcome is binary (e.g., yes/no, success/failure). It is beneficial when we have paired data, such as pre-test/post-test designs, where the same subjects are measured under two different conditions. The test is named after the statistician Quinn McNemar, who introduced it in 1947. It is commonly used in situations where subjects are...
731

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Complex intervention programme to improve patient safety and facilitate deprescribing in frail older patients living at home (COFRAIL): A process evaluation of a cluster randomised controlled trial.

PloS one·2026
Same author

Prediction of cognitive outcome and progression to dementia using ω6-PUFA/ω3-PUFA ratio.

Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association·2026
Same author

Longitudinal Non-interventional Changes of the FORTA Score are Associated with Changes of Cognitive and Physical Function Tests in Community-Dwelling Older People.

Drugs & aging·2026
Same author

Towards Sex- and Gender-Sensitive Pain Management: Participatory Development of the GESCO Intervention for Chronic Non-Cancer Pain and Long-Term Opioid Therapy in Primary Care.

Journal of pain research·2026
Same author

Activity participation reduces the risk of late-life depression: a sex-specific analysis of the AgeCoDe/AgeQualiDe study.

Aging & mental health·2026
Same author

Evaluating MRI correlates of lifestyle-based dementia risk reduction: Results from the AgeWell.de imaging study.

Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 25, 2025

A Standardized Method for Measurement of Elbow Kinesthesia
07:56

A Standardized Method for Measurement of Elbow Kinesthesia

Published on: October 10, 2020

7.6K

Correlation between Oxford Elbow Score and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation: Is one simple question enough?

Sam Razaeian1, Birgitt Wiese2, Dafang Zhang3

  • 1Trauma Department, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.

Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
|April 5, 2020
PubMed
Summary

The Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) strongly correlates with the Oxford Elbow Score (OES) for elbow conditions. SANE is a valuable, accessible tool for assessing elbow joint health alongside existing measures.

Keywords:
Oxford Elbow Score (OES)Scoring systemSingle Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE)Subjective Elbow Value (SEV)elbowjointpatient-reported outcome measure (PROM)

More Related Videos

Software-Assisted Quantitative Measurement of Osteoarthritic Subchondral Bone Thickness
08:52

Software-Assisted Quantitative Measurement of Osteoarthritic Subchondral Bone Thickness

Published on: March 18, 2022

3.3K
Author Spotlight: Fu's Subcutaneous Needling for Knee Osteoarthritis Pain
07:19

Author Spotlight: Fu's Subcutaneous Needling for Knee Osteoarthritis Pain

Published on: March 24, 2023

5.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 25, 2025

A Standardized Method for Measurement of Elbow Kinesthesia
07:56

A Standardized Method for Measurement of Elbow Kinesthesia

Published on: October 10, 2020

7.6K
Software-Assisted Quantitative Measurement of Osteoarthritic Subchondral Bone Thickness
08:52

Software-Assisted Quantitative Measurement of Osteoarthritic Subchondral Bone Thickness

Published on: March 18, 2022

3.3K
Author Spotlight: Fu's Subcutaneous Needling for Knee Osteoarthritis Pain
07:19

Author Spotlight: Fu's Subcutaneous Needling for Knee Osteoarthritis Pain

Published on: March 24, 2023

5.8K

Area of Science:

  • Orthopedic Surgery
  • Patient-Reported Outcome Measures
  • Elbow Joint Assessment

Background:

  • Limited research exists on the correlation between the Oxford Elbow Score (OES) and the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE).
  • This study addresses the gap by evaluating the relationship between these two patient-reported outcome measures for elbow pathology.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To determine the correlation between the Oxford Elbow Score (OES) and the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE).
  • To identify predictors of a higher correlation between OES and SANE in patients with elbow conditions.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of 107 consultations from 86 patients with elbow pathology who completed OES and SANE.
  • Pearson correlation coefficient was calculated to assess the relationship between OES and SANE.
  • Mixed effects linear regression was used to identify predictors for correlation, including age, gender, diagnosis, chief complaint, and visual analog scale (VAS) pain levels.

Main Results:

  • A high positive correlation was observed between SANE and OES (r = 0.903, P < .001).
  • The strongest correlations were with the OES psychosocial (r = 0.885), function (r = 0.847), and pain (r = 0.804) domains.
  • A moderate inverse correlation was found between SANE and VAS pain (r = -0.631), with VAS also predicting OES.

Conclusions:

  • The Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) demonstrates a high correlation with the Oxford Elbow Score (OES).
  • SANE is an accessible, license-free tool for evaluating elbow joint condition.
  • SANE should be considered a valuable adjunct to current elbow assessment scores.