Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Random Error01:04

Random Error

7.5K
Random or indeterminate errors originate from various uncontrollable variables, such as variations in environmental conditions, instrument imperfections, or the inherent variability of the phenomena being measured. Usually, these errors cannot be predicted, estimated, or characterized because their direction and magnitude often vary in magnitude and direction even during consecutive measurements. As a result, they are difficult to eliminate. However, the aggregate effect of these errors can be...
7.5K
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

8.3K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
8.3K
Errors in Global Positioning System01:26

Errors in Global Positioning System

258
Global Positioning System (GPS) technology has revolutionized navigation and positioning, but its accuracy is often compromised by various errors. These errors, stemming from environmental, satellite, and receiver-related factors, require careful mitigation to ensure reliable performance across applications.Atmospheric ErrorsGPS signals travel through the Earth’s ionosphere and troposphere, introducing delays which affect accuracy. The ionosphere is strongly influenced by charged particles,...
258
Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization01:12

Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization

9.2K
Error is the deviation of the obtained result from the true, expected value or the estimated central value. Errors are expressed in absolute or relative terms.
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
9.2K
Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error01:10

Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error

1.2K
The atomic mass of an element varies due to the relative ratio of its isotopes. A sample's relative proportion of oxygen isotopes influences its average atomic mass. For instance, if we were to measure the atomic mass of oxygen from a sample, the mass would be a weighted average of the isotopic masses of oxygen in that sample. Since a single sample is not likely to perfectly reflect the true atomic mass of oxygen for all the molecules of oxygen on Earth, the mass we obtain from this...
1.2K
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

14.2K
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
14.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Optimizing Maritime Search and Rescue Planning via Genetic Algorithms: Incorporating Civilian Vessel Collaboration.

Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland)·2025
Same author

Evolutionary Approach to Optimal Oil Skimmer Assignment for Oil Spill Response: A Case Study.

Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland)·2024
Same author

Metaheuristic-Based Feature Selection Methods for Diagnosing Sarcopenia with Machine Learning Algorithms.

Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland)·2024
Same author

Comparative Study of Classification Algorithms for Various DNA Microarray Data.

Genes·2022
Same author

Optimizing taxon addition order and branch lengths in the construction of phylogenetic trees using maximum likelihood.

Journal of bioinformatics and computational biology·2020
Same author

Machine-Learning Approach to Optimize SMOTE Ratio in Class Imbalance Dataset for Intrusion Detection.

Computational intelligence and neuroscience·2018

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 24, 2025

Asthma Detection Research Based on Voice Signal Processing and Machine Learning
04:04

Asthma Detection Research Based on Voice Signal Processing and Machine Learning

Published on: July 22, 2025

809

Spatiotemporal Approaches for Quality Control and Error Correction of Atmospheric Data through Machine Learning.

Hye-Jin Kim1, Sung Min Park2, Byung Jin Choi2

  • 1Department of Computer Science, Kwangwoon University, 20 Kwangwoon-ro, Nowon-gu, Seoul 01897, Republic of Korea.

Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience
|April 8, 2020
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

We developed three machine learning quality control methods for atmospheric data. Combining weather elements or using spatiotemporal data significantly improved accuracy, reducing errors by up to 17%.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 24, 2025

Asthma Detection Research Based on Voice Signal Processing and Machine Learning
04:04

Asthma Detection Research Based on Voice Signal Processing and Machine Learning

Published on: July 22, 2025

809

Area of Science:

  • Atmospheric Science
  • Data Science
  • Machine Learning

Background:

  • Accurate atmospheric data is crucial for weather forecasting and climate monitoring.
  • Internet of Things (IoT) sensors provide vast amounts of atmospheric data, but data quality can be a challenge.
  • Existing quality control (QC) methods may not fully leverage the richness of available atmospheric data.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose and evaluate three novel machine learning-based quality control (QC) techniques for atmospheric data.
  • To assess the performance of these QC methods using various data inputs and machine learning algorithms.
  • To identify the most effective QC approach for improving the accuracy of atmospheric data.

Main Methods:

  • Developed three machine learning (ML) QC techniques: single time series, combined time series, and spatiotemporal.
  • Applied ML algorithms, including support vector regression, to atmospheric data (e.g., temperature) from seven IoT sensor types.
  • Evaluated QC performance using the root mean squared error (RMSE) metric.

Main Results:

  • QC using combined weather elements showed 0.14% lower average RMSE compared to single-element QC.
  • QC incorporating spatiotemporal characteristics with AWS data achieved 17% lower RMSE than using raw data alone.
  • Machine learning effectively identified and corrected errors in atmospheric sensor data.

Conclusions:

  • Machine learning-based QC techniques offer significant improvements in atmospheric data accuracy.
  • Integrating multiple weather elements and spatiotemporal information enhances QC performance.
  • The proposed methods provide a robust framework for ensuring the reliability of IoT-derived atmospheric data.