Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Fixed Action Patterns01:06

Fixed Action Patterns

17.2K
A fixed action pattern (FAP) is a specific, hard-wired sequence of behaviors that occurs in response to an external stimulus, called a sign stimulus. The behavior is “fixed” because it is essentially unchangeable—proceeding similarly across individuals of a species every time it occurs.
17.2K
Testing a Claim about Mean: Known Population SD01:11

Testing a Claim about Mean: Known Population SD

3.1K
A complete procedure of testing the hypothesis about a population mean is explained here.
Estimating a population mean requires the samples to be distributed normally. The data should be collected from the randomly selected samples having no sampling bias. The sample size needed to be higher than 30, and most importantly, the population standard deviation should be already known.
In most realistic situations, the population standard deviation is often unknown, but in rare circumstances, when it...
3.1K
Testing a Claim about Population Proportion01:24

Testing a Claim about Population Proportion

3.8K
A complete procedure for testing a claim about a population proportion is provided here.
There are two methods of testing a claim about a population proportion: (1) Using the sample proportion from the data where a binomial distribution is approximated to the normal distribution and (2) Using the binomial probabilities calculated from the data.
The first method uses normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution. The requirements are as follows: sample size is large...
3.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Experimental evidence for social learning in semi-natural, wild-type Norway rats.

Scientific reports·2025
Same author

Group size and labour demands determine division of labour as a consequence of demographic stochasticity.

Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences·2025
Same author

Division of labour as key driver of social evolution.

Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences·2025
Same author

The evolution of division of labour: preconditions and evolutionary feedback.

Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences·2025
Same author

Respiratory Rate Recovery After Submaximal Lunging Exercise Is Delayed in Asthmatic Horses with Neutrophilic Airway Inflammation.

Animals : an open access journal from MDPI·2025
Same author

Norway rats recruit cooperation partners based on previous receipt of help while disregarding kinship.

iScience·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 24, 2025

The Three-Chamber Choice Behavioral Task using Zebrafish as a Model System
07:55

The Three-Chamber Choice Behavioral Task using Zebrafish as a Model System

Published on: April 14, 2021

4.3K

Commodity-specific punishment for experimentally induced defection in cooperatively breeding fish.

Jan Naef1, Michael Taborsky1

  • 1Department for Behavioural Ecology, University of Bern, Wohlenstrasse 50a, Hinterkappelen CH-3032, Switzerland.

Royal Society Open Science
|April 8, 2020
PubMed
Summary

Coercive strategies in cooperative breeding are diverse. This study reveals that dominant fish punish subordinates for neglecting territory maintenance but not for failing to defend against predators, suggesting varied cooperation regulation.

Keywords:
cooperationcooperative breedingenforcementnegotiationspay-to-staypunishment

More Related Videos

Using the FishSim Animation Toolchain to Investigate Fish Behavior: A Case Study on Mate-Choice Copying In Sailfin Mollies
10:50

Using the FishSim Animation Toolchain to Investigate Fish Behavior: A Case Study on Mate-Choice Copying In Sailfin Mollies

Published on: November 8, 2018

11.4K
Boldness, Aggression, and Shoaling Assays for Zebrafish Behavioral Syndromes
08:43

Boldness, Aggression, and Shoaling Assays for Zebrafish Behavioral Syndromes

Published on: August 29, 2016

10.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 24, 2025

The Three-Chamber Choice Behavioral Task using Zebrafish as a Model System
07:55

The Three-Chamber Choice Behavioral Task using Zebrafish as a Model System

Published on: April 14, 2021

4.3K
Using the FishSim Animation Toolchain to Investigate Fish Behavior: A Case Study on Mate-Choice Copying In Sailfin Mollies
10:50

Using the FishSim Animation Toolchain to Investigate Fish Behavior: A Case Study on Mate-Choice Copying In Sailfin Mollies

Published on: November 8, 2018

11.4K
Boldness, Aggression, and Shoaling Assays for Zebrafish Behavioral Syndromes
08:43

Boldness, Aggression, and Shoaling Assays for Zebrafish Behavioral Syndromes

Published on: August 29, 2016

10.8K

Area of Science:

  • Behavioral Ecology
  • Evolutionary Biology
  • Animal Behavior

Background:

  • Coercion plays a critical role in the evolution of cooperative behaviors.
  • The pay-to-stay hypothesis in cooperative breeding suggests subordinates provide care for group residency.
  • Previous research has not clearly distinguished between punishment and social disruption effects or different helping behaviors.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the divergent regulatory mechanisms of cooperation in the cooperative breeder *Neolamprologus pulcher*.
  • To experimentally differentiate the effects of manipulating two distinct helping behaviors on subordinate cooperation and dominant responses.
  • To test predictions of the pay-to-stay hypothesis regarding punishment and cooperation dynamics.

Main Methods:

  • A full factorial experimental design was used to manipulate two different subordinate helping behaviors independently in *Neolamprologus pulcher*.
  • Researchers recorded breeder aggression, subordinate helping efforts, and submissive displays in response to experimental manipulations.
  • The study specifically targeted territory maintenance and defense against egg predators as key helping behaviors.

Main Results:

  • Experimental impediment of territory maintenance by subordinates triggered punishment (aggression) from dominants.
  • Preventing subordinate defense against egg predators elicited a compensatory helping response from subordinates without dominant enforcement.
  • These two regulatory mechanisms operated independently, indicating distinct control over different cooperative functions.

Conclusions:

  • Cooperative breeding groups utilize divergent mechanisms to regulate cooperation based on the functional role of specific behaviors.
  • Territory maintenance appears to be regulated by punishment, while predator defense may be appeased proactively by subordinates.
  • These findings highlight the complexity of social negotiations within cooperative groups and the nuanced regulation of cooperative acts.