Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 24, 2025
Isolation of Myoepithelial Cells from Adult Murine Lacrimal and Submandibular Glands
Published on: June 11, 2019
Mucoepidermoid Carcinoma of the Lacrimal Sac: Clinical-Pathologic Analysis, Including Molecular Genetics
Kalla A Gervasio1, Paul J L Zhang2, Robert B Penne1,3
1Department of Ophthalmology, Wills Eye Hospital, Sidney Kimmel Medical College of Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Purpose:
The aim of this study was to assess whether mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the lacrimal sac is a counterpart of CRTC1/3-MAML2 gene fusion-related salivary gland mucoepidermoid carcinoma.
Methods:
In this retrospective observational case series, pathology records were searched for all cases of lacrimal sac mucoepidermoid carcinoma diagnosed between 1990 and 2018. Data collected included demographics, clinical findings, management, and follow-up. Pathologic parameters assessed included tumor morphology, immunohistochemistry, and MAML2 and EGFR fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) studies.
Results:
Six patients with mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the lacrimal sac, 5 males and 1 female, with a median age of 63 years (range 24-66) were identified. Five tumors were managed with radical resection and 1 patient underwent orbital exenteration. None of the patients developed recurrence or metastases with an average follow-up of 18 months (range 13-23). All tumors had morphologic and immunohistochemical features of mucoepidermoid carcinoma and overexpressed EGFR. MAML2 FISH was negative for MAML2 rearrangement in all tumors. EGFR FISH demonstrated EGFR amplification in 1 tumor.
Conclusions:
Mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the lacrimal sac is not a lacrimal sac counterpart of CRTC1/3-MAML2 gene fusion-related salivary gland mucoepidermoid carcinoma. EGFR pathway activation and EGFR amplification in a subset of these neoplasms suggest the potential role for anti-EGFR agents.
