Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Impact of Individuals on a Group01:25

Impact of Individuals on a Group

241
In social psychology, the interplay between individuals and groups is a central concern, particularly regarding how individual actions and characteristics influence group processes and outcomes. While much research emphasizes the group's power in shaping individual behavior, it is equally significant to understand how individuals contribute to the functioning, development, and success of groups.Individual Roles in Group Productivity and Decision-MakingIndividuals are not passive participants in...
241
Social Psychology and Individual Behavior01:29

Social Psychology and Individual Behavior

202
Social psychology examines how group dynamics, emotions, and cultural influences shape individual actions and decision-making. These elements interact to form behavioral patterns that affect personal choices and social interactions.The Role of Group DynamicsGroups play a crucial role in shaping behavior by reinforcing norms and expectations. Individuals derive a sense of self from group membership, often aligning their behaviors with group norms to maintain social cohesion. For example, an...
202
Group Design02:01

Group Design

10.0K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
10.0K
Groupthink01:34

Groupthink

48.9K
When in group settings, we are often influenced by the thoughts, feelings, and behaviors around us. Groupthink is another phenomenon of conformity where modification of the opinions of members in a group aligns with what they believe is the group consensus (Janis, 1972). In such situations, the group often takes action that individuals would not perform outside the group setting because groups make more extreme decisions than individuals do. Moreover, groupthink can hinder opposing trains of...
48.9K
Social Loafing01:37

Social Loafing

38.9K
Another way in which a group presence can affect performance is social loafing—the exertion of less effort by a person working together with a group. Social loafing occurs when our individual performance cannot be evaluated separately from the group. Thus, group performance declines on easy tasks (Karau & Williams, 1993). Essentially individual group members loaf and let other group members pick up the slack. Because each individual’s efforts cannot be evaluated,...
38.9K
Social Proof00:52

Social Proof

31.4K
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
31.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Autonomy in learning: Predictability modulates the beneficial effect of choice on memory.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same author

Pupil dilation offers a time-window on prediction error.

eLife·2026
Same author

Predictive processing: Shedding light on the computational processes underlying motivated behavior.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2025
Same author

A cross-cultural comparison of intrinsic and extrinsic motivational drives for learning.

Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience·2024
Same author

Defining key concepts for mental state attribution.

Communications psychology·2024
Same author

Differentiating between Bayesian parameter learning and structure learning based on behavioural and pupil measures.

PloS one·2023

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 24, 2025

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
06:48

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

9.7K

Predicting Choice Behavior of Group Members.

Lukas Spieß1, Harold Bekkering1

  • 1Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition, and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, Netherlands.

Frontiers in Psychology
|April 9, 2020
PubMed
Summary

Understanding social preferences involves using individual and group knowledge. A logo cue influenced predictions, showing group perception affects how we weigh this information for predicting choices.

Keywords:
assimilationcategorizationgroupindividuationpredictionpreferences

More Related Videos

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

6.2K
The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm
06:18

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm

Published on: October 20, 2022

2.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 24, 2025

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
06:48

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

9.7K
The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

6.2K
The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm
06:18

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm

Published on: October 20, 2022

2.4K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Social Psychology
  • Behavioral Economics

Background:

  • Accurate social predictions rely on inferring others' preferences.
  • Two key information sources exist: individual knowledge and categorical group knowledge.
  • The distinct roles of individual versus group knowledge in predicting choices remain unclear.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how individual and categorical knowledge influence predictions of others' preferences.
  • To determine if group perception modulates the weighting of individual and group knowledge.

Main Methods:

  • Participants predicted object choices of agents exhibiting probabilistic preferences.
  • A visual cue (logo on shirt) was used to manipulate perceived group membership.
  • Predictions were quantified relative to individual and group-level preferences.

Main Results:

  • The presence of a group logo significantly altered the relative influence of individual versus group knowledge.
  • Participants' predictions showed a differential weighting of information based on perceived group affiliation.

Conclusions:

  • Perceived group membership influences how individuals weigh individual-specific versus group-level information when predicting preferences.
  • Results support an assimilation account of categorization, highlighting the importance of group knowledge in social prediction.