Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 24, 2025

The Resident-intruder Paradigm: A Standardized Test for Aggression, Violence and Social Stress
Published on: July 4, 2013
Using, risking, and consent: Why risking harm to bystanders is morally different from risking harm to research
1Rutgers University School of Law, Camden, NJ, 08102-1519, USA.
Abstract:
Subjects in studies on humans are used as a means of conducting the research and achieving whatever good would justify putting them at risk. Accordingly, consent must normally be obtained before subjects are exposed to any substantial risks to their welfare. Bystanders are also often put at risk, but they are not used as a means. Accordingly-or so I argue-consent is more often unnecessary before bystanders are exposed to similar substantial risks to their welfare.
Related Concept Videos
Ethics in Research
Bystander Effect
Milgram's Obedience to Authority
Ethics and Bioethics
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Obedience

