Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

[Subcutaneous emphysema after dental or stomatological treatment, rare complications or consequences of malpractice ?]

Revue medicale de Liege·2022
Same author

Single and combined impacts of irradiation and surgery on lymphatic vasculature and fibrosis associated to secondary lymphedema.

Frontiers in pharmacology·2022
Same author

[Landscape and evolution of the transgender demand in the maxillo-facial surgery: the CHU of Liège as reference center].

Revue medicale de Liege·2022
Same author

[3D planning : from carcinological resection to maxillofacial reconstruction].

Revue medicale de Liege·2022
Same author

[Mastectomy, the initial surgical procedure in transgender patients].

Revue medicale de Liege·2022
Same author

[Use of honey dressings in wound healing].

Revue medicale de Liege·2020

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 24, 2025

Treatment of Facial Deformities using 3D Planning and Printing of Patient-Specific Implants
07:11

Treatment of Facial Deformities using 3D Planning and Printing of Patient-Specific Implants

Published on: May 23, 2020

7.8K

[Contribution of 3D technology for maxillofacial surgery].

M Jaumotte1, P Grobet2, F Pepinster2

  • 1Faculté de Médecine, ULiège, Belgique.

Revue Medicale De Liege
|April 9, 2020
PubMed
Summary

3D printing enables precise, custom facial implants for maxillofacial reconstruction, offering excellent anatomical fit and biocompatibility. This technology presents new possibilities for facial prostheses and surgical outcomes.

Keywords:
3D technologyPrinted implantFace surgery

More Related Videos

Digital Hybrid Model Preparation for Virtual Planning of Reconstructive Dentoalveolar Surgical Procedures
09:10

Digital Hybrid Model Preparation for Virtual Planning of Reconstructive Dentoalveolar Surgical Procedures

Published on: August 5, 2021

2.1K
Designing CAD/CAM Surgical Guides for Maxillary Reconstruction Using an In-house Approach
08:01

Designing CAD/CAM Surgical Guides for Maxillary Reconstruction Using an In-house Approach

Published on: August 24, 2018

9.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 24, 2025

Treatment of Facial Deformities using 3D Planning and Printing of Patient-Specific Implants
07:11

Treatment of Facial Deformities using 3D Planning and Printing of Patient-Specific Implants

Published on: May 23, 2020

7.8K
Digital Hybrid Model Preparation for Virtual Planning of Reconstructive Dentoalveolar Surgical Procedures
09:10

Digital Hybrid Model Preparation for Virtual Planning of Reconstructive Dentoalveolar Surgical Procedures

Published on: August 5, 2021

2.1K
Designing CAD/CAM Surgical Guides for Maxillary Reconstruction Using an In-house Approach
08:01

Designing CAD/CAM Surgical Guides for Maxillary Reconstruction Using an In-house Approach

Published on: August 24, 2018

9.4K

Area of Science:

  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Plastic and Maxillofacial Surgery

Background:

  • 3D design and printing technology is increasingly utilized in medical applications.
  • Maxillofacial bone reconstruction presents unique challenges requiring precise surgical solutions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To highlight the capabilities of 3D technologies in creating custom facial prostheses.
  • To discuss the advantages and potential complications associated with 3D-printed implants in maxillofacial surgery.

Main Methods:

  • Manufacturing of custom facial implants using 3D design and printing.
  • Application of these implants in two reconstructive surgeries within a plastic and maxillofacial surgery department.

Main Results:

  • Achieved high precision in implant production, ensuring anatomical congruence.
  • Demonstrated the biocompatibility of custom-made facial implants.
  • Successfully utilized 3D-printed implants for facial skeleton redefinition.

Conclusions:

  • 3D technology offers advanced solutions for maxillofacial bone reconstruction.
  • Custom 3D-printed facial prostheses provide significant benefits in terms of fit and biocompatibility.
  • Further exploration of advantages and complications of this surgical approach is warranted.