Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 24, 2025

Author Spotlight: Enhancing Graft Viability Assessment Through Quantitative Metrics and Innovative Reservoir Systems
Published on: August 2, 2024
Omission of Heart Transplant Recipients From the Appropriate Use Criteria for Revascularization and the Ramifications
Joe X Xie1, Jon A Kobashigawa2, Kevin F Kennedy3
1Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
Insights
Two-thirds of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) in heart transplant recipients were rarely appropriate. Current guidelines may inflate these rates, impacting quality metrics for heart transplant centers.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Transplant Medicine
- Health Services Research
Background:
- Guidelines recommend routine coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for cardiac allograft vasculopathy in heart transplant recipients.
- Current Appropriate Use Criteria for Revascularization (AUC-R) do not recognize prior heart transplant as a distinct PCI indication.
- The impact of this omission on rarely appropriate (RA) PCI rates is unknown.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the rate of RA PCI procedures in heart transplant recipients.
- To evaluate how these rates affect hospital PCI appropriateness metrics and pay-for-performance scorecards.
Main Methods:
- Observational study using National Cardiovascular Data Registry CathPCI Registry data (2009-2017).
- Included elective PCIs from 96 Medicare-approved heart transplant centers.
- Compared RA PCI rates in heart transplant recipients versus nonrecipients and analyzed changes in hospital quality metrics before and after excluding heart transplant recipients.
Main Results:
- 1.1% of elective PCIs were performed in heart transplant recipients (n=1854).
- Heart transplant recipients had significantly higher RA PCI rates (66.0% vs. 16.9%) compared to nonrecipients.
- Excluding heart transplant recipients from analyses was directly associated with lower RA PCI rates in heart transplant centers.
Conclusions:
- Two-thirds of PCIs in heart transplant recipients were classified as RA by AUC-R.
- The AUC-R's failure to recognize prior heart transplant as a unique PCI indication may inflate RA PCI rates.
- This inflation can potentially affect quality reporting and pay-for-performance metrics for heart transplant centers.
Importance:
Guidelines endorse routine coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) to screen for and treat cardiac allograft vasculopathy in heart transplant recipients. However, the current Appropriate Use Criteria for Revascularization (AUC-R) do not recognize prior heart transplant as a unique PCI indication. Whether this affects rates of rarely appropriate (RA) PCIs is unknown.
Objective:
To assess the rate of RA PCI procedures in heart transplant recipients and how it pertains to hospital PCI appropriateness metrics and pay-for-performance scorecards.
Design, Setting, And Participants:
This observational study used National Cardiovascular Data Registry CathPCI Registry data on all patients undergoing elective PCIs from 96 Medicare-approved heart transplant centers from quarter 3 of 2009 to quarter 2 of 2017. The data were analyzed in July 2018.
Exposures:
Prior heart transplant.
Main Outcomes And Measures:
Rates of RA elective PCIs in heart transplant recipients compared with nonrecipients and hospital rates of RA PCI before vs after exclusion of heart transplant recipients using paired t tests. In a subset of heart transplant centers participating in the Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield's Quality-In-Sights Hospital Incentive Program (Q-HIP), we compared the change in Q-HIP scorecards before vs after excluding heart transplant recipients.
Results:
Of 168 802 participants, 123 124 (72.9%) were men, 137 457 were white, and the mean (SD) age was 66.3 (11.4) years. Of 168 802 elective PCIs performed in heart transplant centers, 1854 (1.1%) were for heart transplant recipients. Heart transplant recipients were less likely to have ischemic symptoms (14.6% vs 61.4%, P < .001), had lower rates of antecedent stress testing (15.0% vs 58.4%, P < .001), and had higher RA PCI rates (66.0% vs 16.9%, P < .001) compared with nonrecipients. In heart transplant centers, the absolute difference in RA rates (before vs after excluding transplant recipients) was directly associated with the proportion of PCIs performed in heart transplant recipients (r = 0.91; P < .001). In the subset of heart transplant centers participating in Q-HIP during the 2016 and 2017 calendar years, 8 of 20 (40%) and 8 of 16 centers (50%), respectively, could have benefited from a change in their Q-HIP scorecards if their RA PCI rates excluded transplant recipients.
Conclusions And Relevance:
Two-thirds of PCIs in heart transplant recipients were deemed RA by the AUC-R. The failure of the AUC-R to consider prior heart transplant as a unique PCI indication may lead to inflated RA PCI rates with the potential for affecting quality reporting and pay-for-performance metrics in heart transplant centers.
Related Concept Videos
Kidney Transplant I: Introduction
Tissue Transplantation
The Biology of Tissue Transplantation
The biology of tissue transplantation hinges on the Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC) molecules. These molecules...
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Kidney Transplant II: Surgical Procedure

