Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving01:29

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving

231
Mechanistic models play a crucial role in algorithms for numerical problem-solving, particularly in nonlinear mixed effects modeling (NMEM). These models aim to minimize specific objective functions by evaluating various parameter estimates, leading to the development of systematic algorithms. In some cases, linearization techniques approximate the model using linear equations.
In individual population analyses, different algorithms are employed, such as Cauchy's method, which uses a...
231
Clearance Models: Noncompartmental Models01:17

Clearance Models: Noncompartmental Models

200
Clearance is a pharmacokinetic parameter traditionally defined by compartment models, signifying the rate at which a drug is expelled from the body. However, a noncompartmental model offers an alternative method for assessing clearance, primarily employing empirical data obtained after administering a single drug dose.
The noncompartmental approach capitalizes on extensive sampling data, correlating the volume of distribution to systemic exposure and the administered dosage. This method enables...
200
Mathematical Modeling: Problem Solving01:29

Mathematical Modeling: Problem Solving

185
Mathematical modeling transforms real-world scenarios into mathematical expressions, allowing for structured problem-solving and analysis. This process involves defining the situation, assigning variables to measurable quantities, selecting an appropriate model, and solving the resulting equation. Such models are invaluable in finance, providing precise methods to evaluate investments, loans, and repayment structures.A widely used example is the calculation of fixed monthly payments on a loan,...
185
Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

6.7K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
6.7K
Pharmacokinetic Models: Comparison and Selection Criterion01:26

Pharmacokinetic Models: Comparison and Selection Criterion

269
Physiological and compartmental models are valuable tools used in studying biological systems. These models rely on differential equations to maintain mass balance within the system, ensuring an accurate representation of the dynamic processes at play.
Physiological models take a detailed approach by considering specific molecular processes. They can predict drug distribution, metabolism, and elimination changes, providing a comprehensive understanding of how drugs interact with the body.
269
Multicompartment Models: Overview01:14

Multicompartment Models: Overview

439
Multicompartment models are mathematical constructs that depict how drugs are distributed and eliminated within the body. They segment the body into several compartments, symbolizing various physiological or anatomical areas connected through drug transfer processes such as absorption, metabolism, distribution, and elimination.
These models offer a more comprehensive representation of drug behavior in the body than one-compartment models. They accommodate the complexity of drug distribution,...
439

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Investigating the Effects of Acute Stress on Neural Mechanisms of Self-controlled Decision-making.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2026
Same author

Context-dependent interaction between goal-directed and habitual control under time pressure.

Communications psychology·2026
Same author

Anti-NMDAR encephalitis impairs intrinsic hippocampal dynamics through neuronal hypercoupling, hub dominance, and aberrant ensembles.

Molecular psychiatry·2026
Same author

The association between the error-related negativity and self-control is moderated by impulsivity and compulsivity.

Communications psychology·2026
Same author

Behavioral evidence for the hierarchical execution of sequential movements.

Communications psychology·2026
Same author

Action repetition biases choice in context-dependent decision-making.

Communications psychology·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 24, 2025

Measuring Delay Discounting in Humans Using an Adjusting Amount Task
07:47

Measuring Delay Discounting in Humans Using an Adjusting Amount Task

Published on: January 9, 2016

15.9K

Modeling Dynamic Allocation of Effort in a Sequential Task Using Discounting Models.

Darío Cuevas Rivera1, Alexander Strobel2, Thomas Goschke3

  • 1Chair of Neuroimaging, Faculty of Psychology, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.

Frontiers in Neuroscience
|April 10, 2020
PubMed
Summary

Effort discounting models often use static parameters. This study reveals dynamic effort exertion arises from changing task needs and forward planning, explaining willingness to exert effort during goal pursuit.

Keywords:
computational modelingdecision makingdiscountingeffortgoal-directed actionsequential

More Related Videos

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

9.0K
The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

1.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 24, 2025

Measuring Delay Discounting in Humans Using an Adjusting Amount Task
07:47

Measuring Delay Discounting in Humans Using an Adjusting Amount Task

Published on: January 9, 2016

15.9K
Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

9.0K
The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

1.0K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Computational Neuroscience
  • Decision Science

Background:

  • Effort is often perceived as intrinsically costly, devaluing rewards.
  • Current models of effort discounting provide static, participant-specific parameters.
  • The dynamic mechanisms influencing effort exertion remain poorly understood.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To model dynamic effort exertion during sequential behavior.
  • To investigate the interplay of effort-discounting and probability-discounting mechanisms.
  • To understand how changing task demands and forward planning influence effort allocation.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a novel sequential decision-making task where participants controlled effort allocation.
  • Utilized a computational model to analyze participant choices and infer parameters.
  • Employed formal model comparison to identify forward-planning strategies.

Main Results:

  • Dynamic effort exertion is explained by the combination of changing task needs and forward planning.
  • The interplay of inferred discounting parameters sufficiently explains effort allocation dynamics.
  • Participant forward-planning strategies were successfully inferred.

Conclusions:

  • A computational model can characterize effort exertion using a few key parameters.
  • The model captures dynamic effort allocation in sequential decision-making.
  • This approach is adaptable for studying the neural basis of forward planning and meta-control.