Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 24, 2025

MRI-guided dmPFC-rTMS as a Treatment for Treatment-resistant Major Depressive Disorder
Published on: August 11, 2015
Managing Esketamine Treatment Frequency Toward Successful Outcomes: Analysis of Phase 3 Data
Michel Nijs1, Ewa Wajs2, Leah Aluisio3
1Janssen Research and Development, LLC, Department of Global Analytics - Neuroscience, Titusville.
Background:
Esketamine nasal spray was recently approved for treatment-resistant depression. The current analysis evaluated the impact of symptom-based treatment frequency changes during esketamine treatment on clinical outcomes.
Methods:
This is a post-hoc analysis of an open-label, long-term (up to 1 year) study of esketamine in patients with treatment-resistant depression (SUSTAIN 2). During a 4-week induction phase, 778 patients self-administered esketamine twice weekly plus a new oral antidepressant daily. In responders (≥50% reduction in Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale total score from baseline), esketamine treatment frequency was thereafter decreased during an optimization/maintenance phase to weekly for 4 weeks and then adjusted to the lowest frequency (weekly or every other week) that maintained remission (Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale ≤ 12) based on a study-defined algorithm. The relationship between treatment frequency and symptom response, based on clinically meaningful change in Clinical Global Impression-Severity score, was subsequently evaluated 4 weeks after treatment frequency adjustments in the optimization/maintenance phase.
Results:
Among 580 responders treated with weekly esketamine for the first 4 weeks in the optimization/maintenance phase (per protocol), 26% continued to improve, 50% maintained clinical benefit, and 24% worsened. Thereafter, when treatment frequency could be reduced from weekly to every other week, 19% further improved, 49% maintained benefit, and 32% worsened. For patients no longer in remission after treatment frequency reduction, an increase (every other week to weekly) resulted in 47% improved, 43% remained unchanged, and 10% worsened.
Conclusions:
These findings support individualization of esketamine nasal spray treatment frequency to optimize treatment response in real-world clinical practice.
Trial Registration:
ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02497287.
More Related Videos
10:22Interictal High Frequency Oscillations Detected with Simultaneous Magnetoencephalography and Electroencephalography as Biomarker of Pediatric Epilepsy
Published on: December 6, 2016
10:36Conventional Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Depression: A Step-by-Step Protocol
Published on: November 21, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Electroconvulsive Therapy
Dose Size and Dosing Frequency: Determination Methods
Dysrhythmias VII: Nursing Management of Dysrhythmias
Determination of Multiple Dosing Parameters: Steady-State, Minimum and Maximum Concentrations
Drug Accumulation During Multiple Dosing: Intermittent IV Infusions
Dosage Regimen: Multiple Oral Dosage