Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 24, 2025
Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
Published on: January 8, 2020
Visual outcomes after SMILE from the first-year experience at a U.S. military refractive surgery center and
Rose K Sia1, Denise S Ryan, Hind Beydoun
1From the Warfighter Refractive Eye Surgery Program and Research Center at Fort Belvoir (Sia, Ryaan, Eaddy, Logan, Rodgers, Rivers), Department of Research Programs (Beydoun), Fort Belvoir, Virginia, USA.
Purpose:
To assess the visual outcomes of small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) after the first year of treatments at a military refractive surgery center and compare with photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) and laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) outcomes during the same period.
Setting:
Warfighter Refractive Eye Surgery Program and Research Center, Fort Belvoir, VA.
Design:
Retrospective study.
Methods:
Records of service members who underwent SMILE, PRK, or LASIK for myopia from March 2017 to February 2018 were reviewed. Preoperative and up to 6-month postoperative data were collected. Visual outcomes were compared between treatments.
Results:
Of 563 treated eyes, 173 (30.7%) underwent SMILE, 304 (54.0%) PRK, and 86 (15.3%) LASIK. In comparing SMILE with PRK 1 month postoperatively, SMILE (145 eyes [87.9%]) attained uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) ≥20/20 more vs PRK (214 eyes [73.8%]; P < .01). Similarly, SMILE (152 eyes [94.4%]) achieved more eyes with manifest spherical equivalent (MSE) within ±0.50 diopters (D) from intended target vs PRK (250 eyes [85.9%]; P = .01). None lost ≥1 line of corrected distance visual acuity in SMILE vs PRK (16 eyes [5.5%]; P < .01). Thereafter, there were no other significant differences except SMILE had 117 eyes (95.1%) vs PRK with 224 eyes (99.6%) achieving UDVA ≥20/20 at 3 months postoperatively (P = .01). In assessing SMILE vs LASIK, all parameters were comparable; however, 77 SMILE eyes (96.3%) had MSE within ±0.50 D from target vs 31 LASIK eyes (83.8%) at 6 months postoperatively (P = .02).
Conclusions:
The first year after SMILE treatments in a U.S. military center demonstrated early postoperative outcomes superior to PRK. SMILE seemed more predictable compared with LASIK.
