Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 24, 2025

A Method for Manipulating Blood Glucose and Measuring Resulting Changes in Cognitive Accessibility of Target Stimuli
Published on: August 12, 2016
Status of Beverages Served to Young Children in Child Care After Implementation of California Policy, 2012-2016
Danielle L Lee1, Klara Gurzo1,2, Lilly A Nhan1,3
1University of California, Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Nutrition Policy Institute, Berkeley, California.
Insights
California child care centers showed improved adherence to healthy beverage policies by 2016, with higher compliance in centers and those participating in the Child and Adult Care Food Program (CACFP). Further support is recommended for non-CACFP sites and homes.
Area of Science:
- Public Health Nutrition
- Childhood Obesity Prevention
- Health Policy Evaluation
Background:
- California mandated healthy beverage standards in child care settings in 2012.
- The policy restricts sweetened beverages and promotes low-fat milk and water access.
- Previous evaluation assessed initial policy implementation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate adherence to California's Healthy Beverages in Child Care Act four years after its implementation.
- To compare adherence rates between 2012 and 2016.
- To identify factors associated with higher adherence.
Main Methods:
- Random sampling of licensed California child care centers and homes in 2012 and 2016.
- Survey data collected on beverage practices and provisions for children aged 1-5 years.
- Logistic regression analysis used to compare adherence between years, site types, and Child and Adult Care Food Program (CACFP) participation.
Main Results:
- Overall policy adherence increased significantly from 27.2% in 2012 to 45.1% in 2016.
- Adherence to specific provisions for milk, 100% juice, and sugar-sweetened beverages also improved.
- Adherence was higher in child care centers compared to homes and in CACFP-participating sites compared to non-CACFP sites.
Conclusions:
- Beverage policy adherence in California child care settings has improved over time.
- Child care centers and CACFP sites demonstrate higher adherence rates.
- Targeted support and promotion are recommended for non-CACFP sites and homes to enhance compliance.
Introduction:
Since 2012, licensed California child care centers and homes, per state policy, are required to serve only unflavored low-fat or nonfat milk to children aged 2 years or older, no more than one serving of 100% juice daily, and no beverages with added sweeteners, and they are required to ensure that drinking water is readily accessible throughout the day. We evaluated adherence to the policy after 4 years in comparison to the adherence evaluation conducted shortly after the policy went into effect.
Methods:
Licensed California child care sites were randomly selected in 2012 and 2016 and surveyed about beverage practices and provisions to children aged 1-5 years. We used logistic regression to analyze between-year differences for all sites combined and within-year differences by site type and participation in the federal Child and Adult Care Food Program (CACFP) in self-reported policy adherence and beverage provisions.
Results:
Respondents in 2016 (n = 680), compared with those in 2012 (n = 435), were more adherent to California's 2010 Healthy Beverages in Child Care Act overall (45.1% vs 27.2%, P < .001) and with individual provisions for milk (65.0% vs 41.4%, P < .001), 100% juice (91.2% vs 81.5%, P < .001), and sugar-sweetened beverages (97.4% vs 93.4%, P = .006). In 2016, centers compared with homes (48.5% vs 28.0%, P = .001) and CACFP sites compared with non-CACFP sites (51.6% vs 27.9%, P < .001) were more adherent to AB2084 overall.
Discussion:
Beverage policy adherence in California child care has improved since 2012 and is higher in CACFP sites and centers. Additional policy promotion and implementation support is encouraged for non-CACFP sites and homes. Other states should consider adopting such policies.
Related Concept Videos
Drug Dosing: Infants and Children
SBAR II: Application of SBAR
SBAR Report from a Nurse to a Health Care Provider
S: "Hello, Dr. Smith. This is Jane, RN, from the Med Surg unit. I am calling to tell you about Ms. White in Room 210, who is experiencing increased pain and redness at her incision site. Her recent...
Regulation of Water Intake

