Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 24, 2025
Detection and Monitoring of Tumor Associated Circulating DNA in Patient Biofluids
Published on: June 8, 2019
Development of a Rapid and Sensitive IDH1/2 Mutation Detection Method for Glial Tumors and a Comparative Mutation
Timucin Avsar1,2,3, Alihan Sursal4,5, Gizem Turan4,5
1Department of Medical Biology, School of Medicine, Bahcesehir University, Sahrayicedid Mah. Batman Sok, No: 66 Kadikoy, Istanbul, 34734, Turkey. timucin.avsar@med.bau.edu.tr.
Background:
The presence of mutations in the isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 and 2 genes (IDH1/2) in glioma tumors is correlated with good prognosis upon standard-of-care treatment. Therefore, information on whether the glioma tumor has IDH1/2 mutations could be used in the correct diagnosis and management of glial tumors. The two most common techniques used to detect IDH1/2 mutations, immunohistochemistry (IHC) and Sanger sequencing, are prone to missing these mutations, especially if the tumor cells that carry the mutations constitute a small minority of the tumor itself.
Objectives:
We developed and validated a rapid method (3-mismatch-amplification refractory mutation system [3m-ARMS]) that can be used for pre-, intra- and postoperative detection of the most common IDH1/2 mutations in glial tumors with high specificity and sensitivity. We also conducted a comprehensive IDH1/2 mutation analysis in 236 glial tumor samples comparing 3m-ARMS, IHC and Sanger sequencing.
Methods:
3m-ARMS was optimized and validated for the specific and sensitive detection of the most common IDH1 and IDH2 mutations. We then analyzed 236 glial tumor samples for the presence of IDH1/2 mutations using 3m-ARMS, Sanger sequencing and IHC techniques. We then analyzed and compared the results, evaluating the diagnostic and screening potential of 3m-ARMS.
Results:
Comparison of the three techniques used in the mutation analysis showed that 3m-ARMS-based IDH1/2 mutation detection was superior to IHC and Sanger sequencing-based IDH1/2 mutation detection in terms of accuracy, specificity and sensitivity, especially for tumor samples in which only a small minority of the cell population carried the mutation. 3m-ARMS could detect the presence of femtogram levels of IDH1/2 mutant DNA in DNA samples in which the mutant DNA-to-wild-type DNA ratio was as low as 1:100,000.
Conclusion:
Sanger sequencing and IHC-based methods have shortcomings when detecting mutations in glial tumors so can miss IDH1/2 mutations in glial tumors when used alone without proper modifications. 3m-ARMS-based mutation detection is fast and simple with potential for use as a diagnostic test for the majority of hot spot mutations in IDH1/2 genes. It can detect IDH1/2 mutations within an hour so can be adapted for intraoperative diagnosis.
