Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 24, 2025

Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack
Published on: May 15, 2020
Summarising and synthesising regression coefficients through systematic review and meta-analysis for improving
Mohammad Ziaul Islam Chowdhury1, Iffat Naeem2, Hude Quan2
1Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary Cumming School of Medicine, Calgary, Alberta, Canada mohammad.chowdhury@ucalgary.ca.
Insights
This systematic review identifies hypertension risk factors to improve prediction models. Combining factors aids early intervention for high blood pressure, reducing associated health risks.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Epidemiology
- Biostatistics
Background:
- Hypertension is a prevalent condition and a significant risk factor for severe health outcomes like heart attack, stroke, kidney disease, and mortality.
- Accurate risk stratification is crucial for identifying individuals who would benefit from targeted interventions, including lifestyle changes and medical treatments, to prevent hypertension development.
- Existing hypertension prediction models can be enhanced through metamodel updating techniques, integrating new data with established models for improved accuracy.
Purpose of the Study:
- To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of hypertension prediction models.
- To identify known risk factors associated with high blood pressure.
- To quantify the magnitude of association between identified risk factors and hypertension.
Main Methods:
- A comprehensive systematic search of multiple databases (MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus) and grey literature.
- Focus on studies predicting hypertension risk in the general population, using 'hypertension' and 'risk prediction' as key concepts.
- Employ random-effect meta-analysis to pool regression coefficients from individual studies, assessing heterogeneity, publication bias, and study quality using the Prediction Model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool.
Main Results:
- The review will synthesize findings from existing hypertension prediction models.
- Pooled estimates of risk factor associations will be generated.
- An assessment of the quality and potential biases of included studies will be provided.
Conclusions:
- The findings will contribute to a better understanding of hypertension risk factors.
- Improved risk prediction models can facilitate timely and effective interventions.
- This research supports evidence-based strategies for hypertension prevention and management.
Introduction:
Hypertension is one of the most common medical conditions and represents a major risk factor for heart attack, stroke, kidney disease and mortality. The risk of progression to hypertension depends on several factors, and combining these risk factors into a multivariable model for risk stratification would help to identify high-risk individuals who should be targeted for healthy behavioural changes and/or medical treatment to prevent the development of hypertension. The risk prediction models can be further improved in terms of accuracy by using a metamodel updating technique where existing hypertension prediction models can be updated by combining information available in existing models with new data. A systematic review and meta-analysis will be performed of hypertension prediction models in order to identify known risk factors for high blood pressure and to summarise the magnitude of their association with hypertension.
Methods And Analysis:
MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus and grey literature will be systematically searched for studies predicting the risk of hypertension among the general population. The search will be based on two key concepts: hypertension and risk prediction. The summary statistics from the individual studies will be the regression coefficients of the hypertension risk prediction models, and random-effect meta-analysis will be used to obtain pooled estimates. Heterogeneity and publication bias will be assessed, along with study quality, which will be assessed using the Prediction Model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool checklist.
Ethics And Dissemination:
Ethics approval is not required for this systematic review and meta-analysis. We plan to disseminate the results of our review through journal publications and presentations at applicable platforms.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Hypertension III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Hypertension and Regulation of Blood Pressure
Hypertension II: Pathophysiology
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Assessing Blood Pressure
Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring
Several factors...
Hypertension V: Nursing Management

