Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 24, 2025

Author Spotlight: Advancing Early Detection and Treatment of Gastrointestinal Tumors
Published on: February 16, 2024
Prognostic factors affecting mortality in patients with esophageal GISTs
Dimitrios Schizas1, George Bagias, Prodromos Kanavidis
11st Department of Surgery, Laikon General Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Purpose:
Esophageal gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) compose a very rare clinical entity, representing 0.7% of all GISTs. Therefore, the clinicopathological factors that affect mortality are currently not adequately examined. We reviewed individual cases of esophageal GISTs found in the literature in order to identify the prognostic factors affecting mortality.
Methods:
MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched to identify clinical studies and case reports referring to esophageal GISTs. The clinicopathological features were recorded and evaluated.
Results:
A total number of 105 patients were found. The median age of patients was 58 years (mean 52.4%). The majority of patients (71.6%) presented with tumor-associated symptoms. Tumors were mostly located at the lower esophagus (72.9%), and the median tumor size was 7 cm. Esophagectomy was the most common surgical approach (54.3%), followed by tumor enucleation (45.7%). The median follow-up period was 34 months; tumor recurrence occurred in 18 cases (18.9%) and 19 died of disease (19.2%). The overall survival rate was 75.8%. We found out that tumor size and high mitotic rate (>10 mitosis per hpf) were significant prognostic factors for survival. Presence of symptoms, ulceration, and tumor necrosis as well as tumor recurrence were also significant prognostic factors (p<0.01).
Conclusions:
Esophageal GISTs' tumor size and mitotic rate are the most significant factors for survival. For dubious cases, a pre-operative biopsy can auspiciously establish the diagnosis of an esophageal GIST. Regarding surgical treatment, tumor enucleation can be safely and feasibly performed for relatively small, intact tumors, whereas large, aggressive tumors are resected with radical esophagectomy.
More Related Videos
06:46Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
Published on: September 27, 2024
09:40An Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy Designed to Minimize Anastomotic Complications and Optimize Conduit Function
Published on: April 17, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Barrett Esophagus-I: Introduction
This constant acid exposure transforms the esophagus's pink mucosal lining (stratified squamous epithelium) into a type of lining more...
Esophageal Strictures-I: Introduction
Etiology
The primary cause of esophageal strictures is long-standing gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), accounting for about 70 to 80% of adult cases. Chronic acid reflux can lead to injury and scarring of the esophageal lining, culminating in...
Barrett Esophagus-II: Clinical Manifestations and Management
To diagnose Barrett's esophagus, healthcare providers often recommend an endoscopy for those showing symptoms of acid reflux. The procedure...
Esophageal Perforation-II: Clinical Manifestations and Management
Clinical Manifestations:
Esophageal Strictures-II: Clinical Features and Management
Healthcare providers should gather a comprehensive medical history and conduct a physical examination for diagnosis. If esophageal stricture is...
Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease II: Clinical Features and Management
Clinical Manifestations
GERD presents itself in a multitude of ways, with symptoms varying from person to person. The hallmark symptoms are...