Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Scanning Electron Microscopy01:07

Scanning Electron Microscopy

5.2K
A scanning electron microscope (SEM) is used to study the surface features of a sample by using an electron beam that scans the sample surface in a two-dimensional manner. Typically, areas between ~1 centimeter to 5 micrometers in width can be imaged. SEM can be used to image bacteria, viruses, tissues as well as larger samples like insects. Conventional SEM gives a magnification ranging from 20X to 30,000X and spatial resolution of 50 to 100 nanometers.
Fundamental Principles
Accelerated...
5.2K
Preparation of Samples for Electron Microscopy01:20

Preparation of Samples for Electron Microscopy

6.6K
To be visualized by an electron microscope, either transmission or scanning, biological samples need to be fixed (stabilized) so the electron beam does not destroy them and dried thoroughly (desiccated/dehydrated) so the vacuum does not affect them. Fixation needs to be done as quickly as possible because the sample properties will start changing as soon as it is removed from its natural environment. For example, in a tissue sample, the oxygen levels begin decreasing, causing an altered...
6.6K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Influence of Bioactive Glass Incorporation in Resin Adhesives of Orthodontic Brackets on Adhesion Properties and Calcium Release.

Polymers·2025
Same author

Influence of Light-Curing Time and Increment Thickness on the Properties of Bulk Fill Composite Resins With Distinct Application Systems.

International journal of dentistry·2024
Same author

Esthetical Properties of Single-Shade and Multishade Composites in Posterior Teeth.

International journal of dentistry·2023
Same author

Effect of Remineralization Pretreatments on Human Dentin Permeability and Bond Strength.

International journal of dentistry·2023
Same author

Substrate Rigidity Effect on CAD/CAM Restorations at Different Thicknesses.

European journal of dentistry·2022
Same author

Efficacy of Bracket Adhesive Remnant Removal by a Fluorescence-Aided Identification Technique with a UV Light Handpiece: <i>In Vitro</i> Study.

International journal of dentistry·2022

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 24, 2025

Oral Biofilm Formation on Different Materials for Dental Implants
11:19

Oral Biofilm Formation on Different Materials for Dental Implants

Published on: June 24, 2018

12.0K

Scanning electron microscopy comparison of the resin-dentin interface using different specimen preparation methods.

Marina G Augusto1, Debora C B Dantas1, Guilherme S de Andrade2

  • 1Department of Restorative Dentistry, Institute of Science and Technology, São Paulo State University-UNESP, São José dos Campos, Brazil.

Microscopy Research and Technique
|April 12, 2020
PubMed
Summary

The diamond disk cut method yields superior scanning electron microscopy (SEM) image quality for resin-dentin interfaces compared to cleavage. This finding is crucial for accurate analysis in dentin bonding studies.

Keywords:
adhesive systembondingdentinscanning electron microscopy

More Related Videos

Processing Embryo, Eggshell, and Fungal Culture for Scanning Electron Microscopy
09:15

Processing Embryo, Eggshell, and Fungal Culture for Scanning Electron Microscopy

Published on: August 16, 2019

9.8K
Characterization Of Multi-layered Fish Scales Atractosteus spatula Using Nanoindentation, X-ray CT, FTIR, and SEM
10:06

Characterization Of Multi-layered Fish Scales Atractosteus spatula Using Nanoindentation, X-ray CT, FTIR, and SEM

Published on: July 10, 2014

15.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 24, 2025

Oral Biofilm Formation on Different Materials for Dental Implants
11:19

Oral Biofilm Formation on Different Materials for Dental Implants

Published on: June 24, 2018

12.0K
Processing Embryo, Eggshell, and Fungal Culture for Scanning Electron Microscopy
09:15

Processing Embryo, Eggshell, and Fungal Culture for Scanning Electron Microscopy

Published on: August 16, 2019

9.8K
Characterization Of Multi-layered Fish Scales Atractosteus spatula Using Nanoindentation, X-ray CT, FTIR, and SEM
10:06

Characterization Of Multi-layered Fish Scales Atractosteus spatula Using Nanoindentation, X-ray CT, FTIR, and SEM

Published on: July 10, 2014

15.5K

Area of Science:

  • Dental Materials Science
  • Microscopy Techniques
  • Adhesive Dentistry

Background:

  • Microscopy is vital for dentin bonding research.
  • Specimen preparation significantly impacts microscopy analysis quality.
  • Variations in sectioning methods can introduce artifacts.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the impact of two specimen sectioning methods on scanning electron microscopy (SEM) image quality.
  • To compare cleavage versus diamond disk cutting for resin-dentin interface analysis.
  • To determine the optimal preparation technique for reliable SEM imaging in bonding studies.

Main Methods:

  • Human molar crowns were prepared, exposing dentin.
  • Universal adhesives were applied in total-etch and self-etch modes.
  • Specimens were sectioned using cleavage or diamond disk methods.
  • SEM imaging was performed at ×2000 magnification after desiccation and gold sputtering.

Main Results:

  • The diamond disk cut method produced significantly higher SEM image quality scores than the cleavage method.
  • No significant difference in image quality was found between total-etch and self-etch adhesive modes.
  • Image quality was assessed by calibrated examiners using a four-point scale.

Conclusions:

  • The diamond disk cut method is preferable for preparing specimens for SEM analysis of the resin-dentin interface.
  • This method enhances the reliability of findings in dentin bonding research.
  • Choosing appropriate sectioning techniques is critical for accurate microscopic evaluation.