Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 24, 2025

08:50
Technique and Patient Selection Criteria of Right Anterior Mini-Thoracotomy for Minimal Access Aortic Valve Replacement
Published on: March 26, 2018
12.1K
Low risk TAVR: Long- term considerations and appropriate patient selection
Justin Price1, Tamunoinemi Bob-Manuel1, Josh Aymond1
1John Ochsner Heart and Vascular Center, New Orleans, LA, USA.
Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases
|April 12, 2020
Summary
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR) shows promise for low-risk patients, but long-term outcomes like valve durability and thrombosis require further study. Careful patient selection and a heart team approach are crucial for optimal results.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Cardiac Surgery
Background:
- Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR) has demonstrated excellent short-term outcomes in low-risk patients, including low complication rates and mortality.
- This success has led to expanded FDA indications for TAVR in this patient population.
- However, long-term data regarding valve durability, subclinical leaflet thrombosis, and pacemaker-related issues remain limited.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review clinical and procedural considerations for selecting low-risk patients for TAVR.
- To identify potential future challenges associated with TAVR procedures.
- To emphasize the importance of life expectancy and valve durability in the decision-making process for TAVR.
Main Methods:
- Review of recent clinical trial data on TAVR in low-risk populations.
- Discussion of clinical and procedural factors influencing patient selection.
- Analysis of potential long-term sequelae and future procedural considerations.
Main Results:
- TAVR in low-risk patients is associated with low complication rates, short hospital stays, and excellent short-term survival.
- Significant uncertainties persist regarding long-term valve performance, including thrombosis and durability.
- The impact of pacemaker implantation and right ventricular pacing on outcomes needs further investigation.
Conclusions:
- While TAVR is a viable option for low-risk patients, careful consideration of long-term outcomes is essential.
- Patient selection should incorporate life expectancy and the expected durability of the aortic valve prosthesis.
- A multidisciplinary heart team approach is critical for optimizing TAVR patient management and outcomes.

