Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Associative Learning01:27

Associative Learning

1.1K
Associative learning is a fundamental concept in behavioral psychology, wherein a connection is established between two stimuli or events, leading to a learned response. This process is critical in understanding how behaviors are acquired and modified. Conditioning, the mechanism through which associations are formed, can be divided into two main types: classical conditioning and operant conditioning, each elucidating different aspects of associative learning.
Classical conditioning, also known...
1.1K
Reinforcement Schedules01:24

Reinforcement Schedules

386
Positive reinforcement is a powerful method for teaching new behaviors to both animals and humans. B.F. Skinner demonstrated this with his experiments using rats in a Skinner box. When a rat pressed a lever, it received a food pellet. This immediate reward encouraged the rat to repeat the behavior. This method, where a reward follows every instance of the behavior, is known as continuous reinforcement. It is highly effective for establishing new behaviors quickly.
Once a behavior is learned,...
386
Purposive Learning01:22

Purposive Learning

376
E. C. Tolman emphasized the purposiveness of behavior — the idea that much of our behavior is goal-directed. For instance, employees who aim for a promotion work diligently to meet their targets. Tolman argued that when classical conditioning and operant conditioning occur, the organism acquires certain expectations. In classical conditioning, a child might fear a dog because they expect it to bite. In operant conditioning, a person might consistently work overtime because they expect a...
376
Observational Learning01:12

Observational Learning

742
Albert Bandura's observational learning, also known as imitation or modeling, occurs when a person observes and imitates another's behavior. It is a quicker process than operant conditioning. A well-known example is the Bobo doll study, where children who saw an adult acting aggressively towards the doll were more likely to act aggressively when left alone, compared to those who observed a nonaggressive adult. Many psychologists view observational learning as a form of latent learning...
742
Reinforcement01:23

Reinforcement

734
Positive and negative reinforcement are key concepts in operant conditioning, a learning process where the consequences of a behavior affect the likelihood of that behavior being repeated.
Positive reinforcement occurs when a behavior is followed by the presentation of a rewarding stimulus, increasing the frequency of that behavior. For example:
734
Cognitive Learning01:21

Cognitive Learning

922
Cognitive learning is based on purposive behavior, incidental learning, and insight learning.
E. C. Tolman's theory of purposive behavior emphasizes that much behavior is goal-directed. He argued that to understand behavior, we must look at the entire sequence of actions leading to a goal. For instance, high school students study hard, not just due to past reinforcement but also to achieve the goal of getting into a good college.
Tolman introduced the idea that behavior is influenced by...
922

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

HSSM: A Widely Applicable Toolbox for Hierarchical Bayesian Neurocognitive Modeling.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

The role of subcortical brain tissue iron as an indicator of dopamine neurophysiology in adolescent cannabis use.

Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology·2026
Same author

Increased Reporting of Speech in Degraded Stimuli in Schizophrenia: A Case Control Study with Sine-Wave-Speech.

Schizophrenia bulletin·2026
Same author

Behavioral Opportunism and Altered Dopamine Dynamics in Mice Exposed to Early Life Adversity.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025
Same author

Parallel trade-offs in human cognition and neural networks: The dynamic interplay between in-context and in-weight learning.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2025
Same author

A Novel Approach-Avoidance Task to Study Decision Making Under Outcome Uncertainty.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025
Same journal

Detection, communication, and individual identification with deep audio embeddings: A case study with North Atlantic right whales.

PLoS computational biology·2026
Same journal

Exploring the structural lexicon of the Proteome via Metric Geometry.

PLoS computational biology·2026
Same journal

Linking retinal sampling in neural encoding models to temporal profiles of visual processing in humans.

PLoS computational biology·2026
Same journal

CAdir: Joint clustering of cells and genes for single-cell transcriptomics with visualization-driven cluster quality assessment.

PLoS computational biology·2026
Same journal

Systematic design of auxotrophic strains and media conditions to probe metabolic functions in E. coli.

PLoS computational biology·2026
Same journal

Neuronal excitability and parameter variability in the Hodgkin-Huxley model.

PLoS computational biology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 24, 2025

New Variations for Strategy Set-shifting in the Rat
09:45

New Variations for Strategy Set-shifting in the Rat

Published on: January 23, 2017

8.5K

Generalizing to generalize: Humans flexibly switch between compositional and conjunctive structures during

Nicholas T Franklin1,2, Michael J Frank2,3

  • 1Department of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America.

Plos Computational Biology
|April 14, 2020
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Humans adaptively generalize knowledge by flexibly combining learned components. This study shows people adjust their generalization strategy based on task statistics, favoring compositional or conjunctive learning when appropriate.

More Related Videos

Operant Procedures for Assessing Behavioral Flexibility in Rats
08:30

Operant Procedures for Assessing Behavioral Flexibility in Rats

Published on: February 15, 2015

21.4K
A Flexible Platform for Monitoring Cerebellum-Dependent Sensory Associative Learning
11:32

A Flexible Platform for Monitoring Cerebellum-Dependent Sensory Associative Learning

Published on: January 19, 2022

3.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 24, 2025

New Variations for Strategy Set-shifting in the Rat
09:45

New Variations for Strategy Set-shifting in the Rat

Published on: January 23, 2017

8.5K
Operant Procedures for Assessing Behavioral Flexibility in Rats
08:30

Operant Procedures for Assessing Behavioral Flexibility in Rats

Published on: February 15, 2015

21.4K
A Flexible Platform for Monitoring Cerebellum-Dependent Sensory Associative Learning
11:32

A Flexible Platform for Monitoring Cerebellum-Dependent Sensory Associative Learning

Published on: January 19, 2022

3.8K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Science
  • Neuroscience
  • Machine Learning

Background:

  • Humans frequently encounter new environments requiring adaptive generalization.
  • Generalization involves deciding which task aspects to apply, which can be complex.
  • Recombining distinct knowledge components is crucial for adaptive behavior in novel situations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether humans modulate their generalization strategy based on task statistics.
  • To determine if people generalize task components separately or conjunctively.
  • To test a normative 'meta-generalization' account of human learning.

Main Methods:

  • Developed navigation tasks manipulating goal value and state transition statistics across contexts.
  • Assessed human generalization of task components separately versus conjunctively.
  • Analyzed how prior task statistics influence generalization strategies.

Main Results:

  • Human generalization is sensitive to previously experienced task statistics.
  • Participants favored compositional or conjunctive generalization based on task structure.
  • Ambiguous task statistics led to a mixture of generalization strategies.

Conclusions:

  • Humans generalize not only task components but also the statistical structure supporting generalization.
  • Findings support a normative 'meta-generalization' framework for adaptive learning.
  • Cognitive flexibility in generalization is key to navigating novel environments.