Comparison of pediatric sports fracture outcomes based on provider type

Objective: Pediatric primary care sports medicine physicians and pediatric sports medicine orthopedic surgeons, in conjunction with physician assistants (PAs), often manage patients with fractures. We sought to determine if pediatric patients with fractures seen by primary care sports medicine physicians had similar outcomes and satisfaction as those seen by orthopedic surgeons. Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review of four to 18-year-old patients who were treated by a sports medicine provider (primary care or orthopedic surgeon/PA) for a fracture of the radius, ulna, tibia, or fibula. Patients or their parents completed a patient satisfaction survey (Short Assessment of Patient Satisfaction [SAPS]) and an injury location-specific patient-reported functional outcome tool: the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) or the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) Scale. Results: Fifty-seven (70%) of the 82 patients were treated by pediatric primary care sports medicine physicians and 25 (30%) were treated by a pediatric sports medicine orthopedic surgeon or surgical PA. The median time from injury to clinically confirmed healing was similar between the two groups (47 vs 60.5 days; p = 0.54), as was the patient satisfaction (SAPS median score = 26 [range = 19-28] vs 24 [range = 9-28]; p = 0.12). Patient-reported outcomes did not differ significantly between groups for the functional outcome tools. Conclusions: Patients seen by pediatric primary care sports medicine physicians and sports medicine orthopedic surgeons have similar patient-reported fracture outcomes and similar satisfaction with care. Pediatric patients with fractures will likely have favorable outcomes when cared for by either of these subspecialty providers.