Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 24, 2025

Surgical Approach and Complications of Stand-alone Lateral Trans-Psoas Interbody Fusion
Published on: February 14, 2025
Laparotomy- and groin-associated complications are common after aortofemoral bypass and contribute to reintervention
Charles DeCarlo1, Laura T Boitano1, Samuel I Schwartz1
1Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass.
Insights
Aortofemoral bypass (AFB) offers durable reconstruction for aortoiliac occlusive disease, but nonvascular complications like ventral hernias and wound infections significantly increase reintervention rates. Careful preoperative planning is essential to mitigate these risks.
Area of Science:
- Vascular Surgery
- Surgical Complications
- Reconstructive Surgery
Background:
- Aortofemoral bypass (AFB) is the most durable treatment for aortoiliac occlusive disease.
- Nonvascular complications, such as laparotomy and groin wound issues, impact morbidity and reintervention after AFB.
- The incidence and effect of these complications on reintervention require further investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the incidence of nonvascular complications following AFB.
- To assess the impact of these complications on reintervention rates.
- To identify predictors of laparotomy and groin wound complications.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of institutional data for AFB procedures (2000-2017).
- Analysis of primary endpoints: laparotomy-associated and groin wound complications.
- Kaplan-Meier and Fine-Gray methods used to analyze reintervention rates and predictors.
Main Results:
- 21% of patients experienced laparotomy complications (15.3% ventral hernias), with 10% requiring surgery.
- 12% of groins had wound complications, 4.9% needing intervention.
- Predictors for laparotomy complications included untreated ventral hernia and hypertension; wound complications were associated with higher BMI, anticoagulation, and prior iliac stents.
Conclusions:
- AFB provides durable reconstruction with low graft reintervention rates.
- Laparotomy and groin wound complications significantly contribute to morbidity and overall reintervention after AFB.
- Identifying predictive factors for these complications is crucial for preoperative planning and patient counseling.
Background:
Despite endovascular advancements, aortofemoral bypass (AFB; aortounifemoral and aortobifemoral bypass) remains the most durable option for aortoiliac occlusive disease. Whereas AFB reduces vascular aortoiliac reintervention, the impact of laparotomy-associated and groin wound complications on morbidity and reintervention is unclear. The aim of this study was to establish the incidence of nonvascular complications after AFB and to determine their effect on reintervention.
Methods:
Institutional data for AFB (2000-2017) were queried. Primary end points included laparotomy-associated and groin wound complications. Total reintervention was defined as the composite outcome of reinterventions for laparotomy and groin wound complications and graft patency. Kaplan-Meier analysis estimated freedom from reintervention. Fine-Gray method for competing long-term risk determined predictors of laparotomy complications. Logistic regression, adjusting variability for patient-level clustering, determined predictors of wound complications.
Results:
There were 553 limbs in 281 patients (272 aortobifemoral and 9 aortounifemoral bypasses; age, 67.6 ± 11.0 years; 50.5% female). Ninety (32%) patients had prior abdominal surgery, 3.2% had prior ventral hernia (VH) repair, 2.9% had untreated VH, and 0.7% had history of small bowel obstruction. The majority of patients underwent AFB for claudication (66.2%); 87.2% had TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC) D lesions, 31.4% required a suprarenal clamp or higher, 16.4% had concomitant renovisceral revascularization, and 6.4% were receiving anticoagulation. Sixty-seven (12.1%) limbs had redo femoral artery exposures, 32.4% required femoral outflow adjunct, and 1.8% had simultaneous lower extremity bypass. The 30-day mortality was 2.9%. During median follow-up of 5.3 years (interquartile range, 7.3 years), 21% had laparotomy complications (VH, 15.3%; small bowel obstruction, 7.5%; other, 2.1%), including 10.0% requiring operative intervention. Sixty-seven (12%) groins had a wound complication; 4.9% required intervention. Unadjusted 1-, 3-, and 5-year freedom from graft reintervention was 93.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 90.1%-96.5%), 85.3% (80.7%-90.2%), and 79.6% (74.1%-85.5%), respectively. Freedom from total reintervention at 1 year, 3 years, and 5 years was 82.1% (95% CI, 77.4%-87.1%), 73.6% (68.0%-79.6%), and 65.1% (58.7%-72.2%). Predictors of laparotomy complications were untreated VH (P = .01) and hypertension (P = .01). Protective factors were thoracoabdominal approach (P < .01) and aortounifemoral bypass (P < .01). Predictors of wound complications included body mass index (per kg, 1.07; CI, 1.01-1.15; P = .018), anticoagulation (2.59; CI, 1.01-8.37; P = .049), and previous iliac stents (2.60; CI, 1.36-4.94; P = .004).
Conclusions:
Whereas AFB is a durable reconstruction with infrequent need for graft reintervention, laparotomy- and groin wound-associated complications contribute significantly to morbidity and reintervention after AFB. Predictive factors for laparotomy and groin wound complications should be considered in preoperative planning and selection of patients for AFB and in the discussion of outcomes.
Related Concept Videos
Aneurysm III: Interprofessional Care
Peripheral Artery Disease V: Postoperative Nursing Management
