Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Bias01:22

Bias

7.2K
Bias refers to any tendency that prevents a question from being considered unprejudiced. In research, bias occurs when one outcome or answer is selected or encouraged over others in sampling or testing. Bias can occur during any research phase, including study design, data collection, analysis, and publication.
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
7.2K
Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

1.1K
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:  
1.1K
Convenience Sampling Method00:55

Convenience Sampling Method

10.8K
Sampling is a technique to select a portion (or subset) of the larger population and study that portion (the sample) to gain information about the population. Data are the result of sampling from a population. The sampling method ensures that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population.
Convenience sampling is a non-random method of sample selection; this method selects individuals that are easily accessible and may result in biased data. For example, a marketing...
10.8K
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

8.3K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
8.3K
Surveys02:16

Surveys

16.5K
Often, psychologists develop surveys as a means of gathering data. Surveys are lists of questions to be answered by research participants, and can be delivered as paper-and-pencil questionnaires, administered electronically, or conducted verbally. Generally, the survey itself can be completed in a short time, and the ease of administering a survey makes it easy to collect data from a large number of people.
16.5K
Contaminants and Errors01:16

Contaminants and Errors

313
Effective sample preparation is crucial for accurate and reliable laboratory analysis. During this process, two significant sources of error can arise: concentration bias from improper sample splitting and contamination caused by methods used to reduce particle size, such as grinding or homogenization. Identifying and minimizing these potential errors is crucial to ensuring the validity of the analysis.
Another key consideration is determining the appropriate number of samples required to...
313

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Immigrant perspectives on navigating the US healthcare system in the Post-COVID-19 landscape: a photo-elicitation project.

Journal of migration and health·2026
Same author

Cost-effectiveness of community-based interventions for reducing opioid overdose and non-overdose deaths: simulation modeling of HEALing Communities Study.

Lancet regional health. Americas·2026
Same author

Cost-effectiveness of in-kind nutritional support for impoverished persons with tuberculosis to reduce mortality and disengagement from care in India: a modelling study.

BMJ global health·2026
Same author

Impact of Removing the Universal Hepatitis B Birth-Dose Vaccination in the US.

JAMA pediatrics·2026
Same author

Hepatitis C Virus Testing in Perinatally Exposed Children.

JAMA network open·2026
Same author

Centering AIDS Drug Assistance Programs in the US HIV Response.

Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 24, 2025

Methods of Soil Resampling to Monitor Changes in the Chemical Concentrations of Forest Soils
09:16

Methods of Soil Resampling to Monitor Changes in the Chemical Concentrations of Forest Soils

Published on: November 25, 2016

17.3K

Estimation and correction of bias in network simulations based on respondent-driven sampling data.

Lin Zhu1,2, Nicolas A Menzies3, Jianing Wang4

  • 1Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA. linzhu1@stanford.edu.

Scientific Reports
|April 15, 2020
PubMed
Summary

Respondent-driven sampling (RDS) can bias network structure analysis. This study developed a simulation platform to identify and correct biases in network statistics like density, homophily, and transitivity for hard-to-reach populations.

More Related Videos

Modeling Fast-scan Cyclic Voltammetry Data from Electrically Stimulated Dopamine Neurotransmission Data Using QNsim1.0
07:41

Modeling Fast-scan Cyclic Voltammetry Data from Electrically Stimulated Dopamine Neurotransmission Data Using QNsim1.0

Published on: June 5, 2017

10.2K
Efficient Sampling of Genetically Encoded Biosensor Design Space Enabled with a Design of Experiments and Automation Workflow
08:58

Efficient Sampling of Genetically Encoded Biosensor Design Space Enabled with a Design of Experiments and Automation Workflow

Published on: October 17, 2025

472

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 24, 2025

Methods of Soil Resampling to Monitor Changes in the Chemical Concentrations of Forest Soils
09:16

Methods of Soil Resampling to Monitor Changes in the Chemical Concentrations of Forest Soils

Published on: November 25, 2016

17.3K
Modeling Fast-scan Cyclic Voltammetry Data from Electrically Stimulated Dopamine Neurotransmission Data Using QNsim1.0
07:41

Modeling Fast-scan Cyclic Voltammetry Data from Electrically Stimulated Dopamine Neurotransmission Data Using QNsim1.0

Published on: June 5, 2017

10.2K
Efficient Sampling of Genetically Encoded Biosensor Design Space Enabled with a Design of Experiments and Automation Workflow
08:58

Efficient Sampling of Genetically Encoded Biosensor Design Space Enabled with a Design of Experiments and Automation Workflow

Published on: October 17, 2025

472

Area of Science:

  • Network Science
  • Epidemiology
  • Statistical Modeling

Background:

  • Respondent-driven sampling (RDS) is crucial for studying hard-to-reach populations and their network structures.
  • Understanding network features is vital for public health programs, especially for infectious disease transmission.
  • Previous research focused on RDS's accuracy for population proportions, with limited insight into network structure biases.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a simulation platform for analyzing biases in network structure inference from RDS data.
  • To characterize potential biases in key network statistics: density/mean degree, homophily, and transitivity.
  • To assess the effectiveness of proposed adjustments in improving the validity of network simulations.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a mathematical and statistical platform simulating network structures using exponential random graph models.
  • Mimicked RDS data generation mechanisms within the simulation framework.
  • Employed generalized linear models to predict original network statistics from sample network statistics and design features.

Main Results:

  • Respondent-driven sampling (RDS) can introduce significant biases in estimating network density/mean degree and transitivity.
  • RDS may inflate homophily estimates when preferential recruitment is present.
  • Adjustments derived from prediction models showed potential to improve simulated network validity and reduce bias.

Conclusions:

  • RDS can distort network statistics, impacting the reliability of network structure analyses in hard-to-reach populations.
  • The developed simulation platform and adjustment methods offer a promising approach to mitigate these biases.
  • Further application of these methods can enhance the accuracy of network-based public health interventions and research.