Updated: Dec 24, 2025

A Simple Double Centrifugation Tube Method to Obtain Platelet-rich Plasma from Equine Blood
Published on: August 15, 2025
Sylvain Bellier1, Nathalie Cordonnier2
1Unité de biochimie, École nationale vétérinaire d'Alfort, 7, av du Général-de-Gaulle, 94704 Maisons-Alfort cedex.
This article provides a comprehensive overview of blood cell analysis and clotting function testing in dogs, cats, horses, and cattle. It explains how to perform blood counts, examine cell shapes, and interpret abnormal results, while highlighting the unique differences between these animal species.
You might also read
Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.
Area of Science:
Background:
Limited consensus exists regarding standardized reference ranges across diverse domestic animal populations. Practitioners often struggle to interpret hematological data due to significant physiological variations between species. Prior research has shown that diagnostic accuracy depends heavily on understanding these interspecies disparities. No prior work had resolved the complexities of applying human-derived laboratory standards to veterinary patients. That uncertainty drove the need for a focused review on species-specific blood cell characteristics. Clinicians frequently encounter challenges when distinguishing between benign variations and true pathological states in animal blood smears. This gap motivated a systematic evaluation of current laboratory practices in veterinary medicine. The current literature lacks a unified guide for interpreting these essential diagnostic metrics across common domestic animals.
Purpose Of The Study:
The aim of this article is to present the technical aspects and clinical applications of blood cell examination and haemostasis in dogs and cats. The authors seek to address the challenges posed by significant physiological variations between different animal species. This work provides a detailed overview of how to perform accurate blood counts and interpret cellular morphology. The researchers intend to clarify the significance of pathologic cell counts in diverse veterinary patients. They also aim to delineate the unique hematological features observed in herbivores such as horses and cattle. By synthesizing this information, the authors provide a guide for practitioners navigating complex diagnostic scenarios. This review addresses the need for a clear understanding of interspecies differences in blood composition. The study ultimately serves to improve the precision of hematological assessments in modern veterinary medicine.
The researchers propose that practitioners must utilize species-specific reference intervals to interpret blood counts accurately. Unlike humans, dogs and cats exhibit distinct cellular morphologies that complicate standard diagnostic procedures. This approach prevents the misclassification of normal physiological variations as pathological conditions in clinical settings.
The authors examine blood cell cytology and haemostasis testing as primary tools. These techniques allow for the assessment of both quantitative cell counts and qualitative morphological characteristics. By evaluating these components, clinicians can distinguish between healthy and diseased states across different animal species.
The authors state that species-specific differences in blood cell structure necessitate separate analytical chapters for herbivores. Horses and cattle possess unique hematological features that differ significantly from those found in small carnivores. This distinction ensures that laboratory results are interpreted within the correct biological context.
Main Methods:
Review Approach involves a systematic synthesis of technical protocols for blood cell analysis. The authors evaluate methodologies for performing complete blood counts in various domestic species. This process includes examining standard practices for assessing clotting function in clinical settings. The researchers compare established techniques for identifying normal and abnormal cellular structures. They synthesize existing literature to highlight the most reliable diagnostic procedures currently available. This approach focuses on the practical application of laboratory tests for dogs, cats, horses, and cattle. The authors exclude bone marrow investigations from this comprehensive summary of peripheral blood analysis. This methodology ensures a clear focus on the most relevant diagnostic tools for general veterinary practitioners.
Main Results:
Key Findings From the Literature indicate that significant quantitative and qualitative differences exist between the blood cells of various animal species. The authors demonstrate that these variations directly impact the interpretation of hematological results. They report that canine and feline blood profiles require distinct diagnostic considerations compared to those of herbivores. The review highlights that specific morphological traits are essential for identifying abnormal cell counts in horses and cattle. Findings suggest that failing to account for these species-specific differences leads to diagnostic errors. The literature confirms that blood count realization and cytology remain the primary methods for assessing animal health. The authors identify that these technical aspects are successfully applied in clinical veterinary practice today. These results provide a clear basis for distinguishing between physiological variations and true pathological states in animals.
Conclusions:
Synthesis and Implications suggest that species-specific interpretation remains the cornerstone of accurate veterinary diagnosis. The authors emphasize that clinicians must account for distinct morphological traits when evaluating canine and feline samples. Reviewing these findings indicates that herbivore blood profiles require separate analytical considerations compared to carnivores. The evidence highlights that quantitative discrepancies often reflect biological diversity rather than underlying disease. This synthesis confirms that standardized counting techniques must be adapted for different animal groups. The authors propose that recognizing these variations prevents misdiagnosis of hematological disorders in clinical practice. Future diagnostic efforts should prioritize the integration of these specific morphological differences into routine laboratory protocols. These insights provide a framework for improving the precision of blood analysis in veterinary settings.
The researchers utilize quantitative data from blood counts and qualitative observations from cytology to define normal versus abnormal states. These data types allow for a comprehensive assessment of hematological health. By integrating these metrics, the authors provide a clear guide for identifying potential pathologies in animals.
The authors measure both the number of circulating cells and their physical appearance under a microscope. This dual approach helps identify pathologic cell counts that indicate underlying illness. Comparing these measurements against species-specific norms is vital for accurate clinical assessment.
The authors propose that understanding interspecies variation is the most effective way to improve diagnostic outcomes. By acknowledging these differences, veterinarians can avoid common pitfalls in hematological interpretation. This perspective shifts the focus toward more precise, species-tailored clinical decision-making.