Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 24, 2025

Flexible Colonoscopy in Mice to Evaluate the Severity of Colitis and Colorectal Tumors Using a Validated Endoscopic Scoring System
Published on: October 16, 2013
Inter-Observer Agreement of a New Endoscopic Score for Ulcerative Colitis Activity: Preliminary Experience
Mariabeatrice Principi1, Antonella Contaldo1, Francesco Paolo Bianchi2
1Section of Gastroenterology, Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, University "Aldo Moro" of Bari, 70124 Bari, Italy.
Abstract:
Ulcerative colitis (UC) endoscopic scores translate mucosal damage into values standardizing image analysis. Due to potential limits of current endoscopic activity indexes, we have elaborated on a new score, the "Extended Mayo Endoscopic Score (EMES)," and evaluated its inter-observer agreement in a multicenter endoscopy team, comparing concordance with the Mayo subscore. Sixteen UC consecutive patients underwent follow-up colonoscopy. Recorded videos were anonymously loaded on a web platform. Thirteen expert endoscopists evaluated UC activity using both Mayo and EMES. EMES was described in every colon segment: erythema (0: absent, 1: mild, 2: moderate, 3: severe), vascular pattern (0: normal, 1: reduction, 2: disappearance), erosions and ulcers (0: absent, 1: from 1 to 5, 2: 6 to 10, 3: >10). Weighted Fleiss' kappa with 95% confidence interval (CI) and p-value defined inter-rater agreement. Global inter-observer agreement of EMES was moderate (kappa = 0.56, 95% CI = 0.46-0.67, p < 0.001). The evaluation of each colonic segment showed moderate agreement for all segments: ascending (kappa = 0.46, 95% CI = 0.32-0.60, p < 0.001), transverse (kappa = 0.48, 95% CI = 0.29-0.67, p < 0.001); descending (kappa = 0.49, 95% CI = 0.35-0.64, p < 0.001), sigmoid (kappa = 0.52, 95% CI = 0.39-0.65, p < 0.001) and rectum (kappa = 0.55, 95% CI = 0.42-0.69, p < 0.001). Mayo subscore agreement was similar to global EMES (kappa = 0.53, 95% CI = 0.39-0.66, p = 0.001). Therefore, our report emphasizes the importance of assessing inter-observer agreement for EMES, but also for other known scoring systems, including the Mayo subscore.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Peptic Ulcer Disease III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Few clinical manifestations differentiate gastric ulcers from duodenal ulcers. Distinctions in the location, timing, and pain relief are crucial for healthcare providers in differentiating between gastric and duodenal ulcers during clinical assessments.
Endoscopic Procedures II: Colonoscopy
Assessment of the Rectum and Anus
Rectal Inspection
Begin by inspecting the perianal and anal areas for color, texture, rashes,...
Endoscopic Procedures IV: Sigmoidoscopy and Laproscopy
Sigmoidoscopy
Sigmoidoscopy is a diagnostic procedure that uses a flexible sigmoidoscope equipped with a light source and camera to examine the rectum and sigmoid colon. The procedure involves inserting the tube through the anus...
Ultrasound II: Endoscopic Ultrasound and FibroScan
Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS):
Assessment of the Gastrointestinal System I: Subjective Data
Health History
The initial step in assessing the GI system is obtaining a comprehensive health history. This includes inquiring about the patient's history or presence of problems...

