Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Cause and Effect01:53

Cause and Effect

11.9K
While variables are sometimes correlated because one does cause the other, it could also be that some other factor, a confounding variable, is actually causing the systematic movement in our variables of interest. For instance, as sales in ice cream increase, so does the overall rate of crime. Is it possible that indulging in your favorite flavor of ice cream could send you on a crime spree? Or, after committing crime do you think you might decide to treat yourself to a cone?
11.9K
The Representativeness Heuristic02:13

The Representativeness Heuristic

16.6K
The representative heuristic describes a biased way of thinking, in which you unintentionally stereotype someone or something. For example, you may assume that your professors spend their free time reading books and engaging in intellectual conversation, because the idea of them spending their time playing volleyball or visiting an amusement park does not fit in with your stereotypes of professors.
16.6K
Reason and Intuition01:37

Reason and Intuition

7.3K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
7.3K
Fundamental Attribution Error01:14

Fundamental Attribution Error

13.6K
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...
13.6K
Unrealistic Optimism Bias01:30

Unrealistic Optimism Bias

145
Unrealistic optimism bias is the tendency to overestimate the likelihood of positive outcomes. This cognitive bias makes individuals believe they are less likely to experience failures, setbacks, or risks and more likely to succeed than others. For example, people may assume they are less prone to health issues, accidents, or financial struggles than their peers, even when they share similar risk factors.One key component of this bias is the above-average effect, where individuals perceive...
145
Correspondence Bias01:17

Correspondence Bias

136
Correspondence bias, also referred to as the fundamental attribution error, describes the tendency to attribute another person’s behavior to internal characteristics rather than situational influences. This cognitive bias leads individuals to overlook external factors that may be influencing actions, thereby fostering potentially inaccurate assessments of others’ intentions and dispositions.Empirical Evidence for Correspondence BiasResearch has consistently demonstrated the...
136

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

AI-assisted teams outperform AI-led teams but not human-only teams in assessing research reproducibility in quantitative social science.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same author

The Ideological Turing Test: A Behavioral Measure of Open-Mindedness and Perspective-Taking.

Cognitive science·2025
Same author

The three-dimensional community structure of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) traits captured by the Adult ADHD Self-Report Scale: An exploratory graph analysis.

International journal of methods in psychiatric research·2023
Same author

Where next for partial randomisation of research funding? The feasibility of RCTs and alternatives.

Wellcome open research·2023
Same author

Recovery From Nicotine Addiction: A Diffusion Model Decomposition of Value-Based Decision-Making in Current Smokers and Ex-smokers.

Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco·2023
Same author

Mind the gap: Distributed practice enhances performance in a MOBA game.

PloS one·2022

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 24, 2025

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

1.0K

Evidence for the rationalisation phenomenon is exaggerated.

Tom Stafford1

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Sheffield, S1 2LTSheffield, United Kingdom. t.stafford@sheffield.ac.ukhttp://tomstafford.staff.shef.ac.uk/.

The Behavioral and Brain Sciences
|April 16, 2020
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Rationalization effects in cognitive psychology are often overstated. Experimental findings suggest these effects are small and may not reflect widespread, persistent behaviors, with alternative explanations possible.

More Related Videos

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
05:48

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

Published on: June 12, 2020

6.2K
The Deese-Roediger-McDermott DRM Task: A Simple Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate False Memories in the Laboratory
07:26

The Deese-Roediger-McDermott DRM Task: A Simple Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate False Memories in the Laboratory

Published on: January 31, 2017

39.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 24, 2025

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

1.0K
The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
05:48

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

Published on: June 12, 2020

6.2K
The Deese-Roediger-McDermott DRM Task: A Simple Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate False Memories in the Laboratory
07:26

The Deese-Roediger-McDermott DRM Task: A Simple Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate False Memories in the Laboratory

Published on: January 31, 2017

39.4K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Decision-Making Science

Background:

  • The phenomenon of rationalization, or post-hoc justification of decisions, is a key concept in understanding human behavior.
  • Existing literature often emphasizes the pervasiveness and significant impact of rationalization on decision-making.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically evaluate the evidence supporting the extent and impact of rationalization.
  • To investigate alternative interpretations of experimental findings related to rationalization.

Main Methods:

  • Review and re-analysis of existing experimental data on rationalization.
  • Examination of case studies and examples used to illustrate rationalization effects.

Main Results:

  • Experimental evidence indicates that rationalization effects are typically small, not gross.
  • The pervasiveness and persistence of rationalization remain largely unsubstantiated by current data.
  • Alternative interpretations, including deliberate reason-responsiveness, are plausible for some observed behaviors.

Conclusions:

  • The evidence for widespread and significant rationalization is exaggerated.
  • Further research is needed to clarify the true nature and extent of rationalization versus genuine reason-responsiveness.