Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 15, 2026
Protocol for Human Blastoids Modeling Blastocyst Development and Implantation
Published on: August 10, 2022
Correlation between morphokinetic parameters and standard morphological assessment: what can we predict from early
Catherine Jacobs1, Mariana Nicolielo1, Renata Erberelli1
1Embryology Department - Huntington Medicina Reprodutiva, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Objectives:
To evaluate the association between morphology grading and morphokinetic parameters in blastocyst stage embryos cultured in a time-lapse system.
Methods:
This retrospective cohort study included patients offered fertility treatment with autologous oocytes in our clinic between October 2017 and May 2019 using a time-lapse system. The embryos were morphologically graded according to the criteria developed by Gardner and Schoolcraft and their morphokinetic parameters were recorded.
Results:
Our results indicated that the time of pronuclei fading (tPNf), time to cleavage into two (t2), four (t4), and eight (t8) cells, and time to start of blastulation (tB) were significantly different according to the morphological quality of the blastocysts formed. In the early development stage, tPNf, t2 and t4 differed between good (AA, AB, BA, BB) and poor (CC) quality potential blastocysts. The 8-cell stage time separated embryos graded as AA blastocysts in terms of morphology from embryos graded as BB. Earlier tB correlated with higher quality embryos (AA, AB, BA).
Conclusion:
Our results showed that the first kinetic parameters (tPNf, t2, and t4) distinguished top-graded from low-graded blastocysts. Between top-graded blastocysts, t8 separated BB blastocysts from AA blastocysts. And finally, tB also told apart BB blastocysts from AA, AB, and BA blastocysts. These time-related parameters may be applied even in centers without time-lapse systems.
