Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 24, 2025

Transthoracic Speckle Tracking Echocardiography for the Quantitative Assessment of Left Ventricular Myocardial Deformation
Published on: October 20, 2016
Speckle tracking deformation imaging to detect regional fibrosis in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a comparison between
Efstathios D Pagourelias1,2, Oana Mirea1, Jürgen Duchenne1
1Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, University Hospital Leuven, Catholic University Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
Insights
Two-dimensional (2D) longitudinal strain is the best echocardiographic parameter for detecting fibrosis in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), outperforming 3D measures. These deformation parameters are not interchangeable in hypertrophic hearts.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Medical Imaging
- Biomedical Engineering
Background:
- Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is characterized by myocardial hypertrophy and can lead to fibrosis.
- Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) with late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) is the gold standard for detecting fibrosis.
- Echocardiography-derived strain parameters, both 2D and 3D, are increasingly used to assess myocardial deformation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To directly compare 2D and 3D deformation parameters in hypertrophic hearts.
- To determine which deformation parameters best reflect underlying fibrosis in HCM, as defined by LGE-CMR.
- To investigate factors influencing the correlation between 2D and 3D strain measurements.
Main Methods:
- Inclusion of 40 HCM patients and 15 hypertensive (HTN) patients with myocardial hypertrophy.
- Acquisition of 2D and 3D speckle tracking echocardiography and LGE-CMR data.
- Analysis of correlations between 2D/3D deformation parameters and LGE, and regression analysis for influencing factors.
Main Results:
- 2D and 3D deformation parameters showed poor to moderate correlations and are not interchangeable.
- 3D longitudinal strain (LS) and circumferential strain (CS) were consistently higher than 2D values.
- Hypertrophy substrate (HCM vs. HTN) and magnitude influenced 2D-3D strain correlations.
- 2D-LS demonstrated the best area under the curve (AUC) for fibrosis detection, while 3D-LS showed higher specificity.
Conclusions:
- 2D and 3D deformation parameters are not interchangeable in hypertrophic hearts due to variability.
- Factors like hypertrophy substrate, magnitude, and tracking algorithm assumptions contribute to variability.
- 2D-peak segmental longitudinal strain remains the optimal parameter for tissue characterization and fibrosis detection in HCM.
Aims:
We aimed at directly comparing three-dimensional (3D) and two-dimensional (2D) deformation parameters in hypertrophic hearts and depict which may best reflect underlying fibrosis in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), defined by late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) in cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR).
Methods And Results:
We included 40 HCM [54.1 ± 14.3 years, 82.5% male, maximum wall thickness (MWT) 19.3 ± 4.8 mm] and 15 hypertensive (HTN) patients showing myocardial hypertrophy (58.1 ± 15.6 years, 80% male, MWT 12.8 ± 1.4 mm) who have consecutively undergone 2D-, 3D-speckle tracking echocardiography and LGE CMR. Deformation parameters (2D and 3D) presented overall poor to moderate correlations, with 3D_longitudinal strain (LS) and 3D_circumferential strain (CS) values being constantly higher compared to 2D derivatives. By regression analysis, hypertrophy substrate (HCM vs. hypertension) and hypertrophy magnitude were the parameters to influence 2D-3D LS and CS strain correlations (R2 = 0.66, P < 0.001 and R2 = 0.5, P = 0.001 accordingly). Among segmental deformation indices, 2D_LS showed the best area under the curve [AUC = 0.78, 95% confidence intervals (CI) (0.75-0.81), P < 0.0005] to detect fibrosis, with 3D deformation parameters showing similar AUC (0.65) and 3D_LS presenting the highest specificity [93.1%, 95% CI (90.6-95.1)].
Conclusions:
In hypertrophic hearts, 2D and 3D deformation parameters are not interchangeable, showing modest correlations. Thickness, substrate, and tracking algorithm calculating assumptions seem to induce this variability. Nevertheless, among HCM patients 2D_peak segmental longitudinal strain remains the best strain parameter for tissue characterization and fibrosis detection.
More Related Videos
07:21Magnetic Resonance Derived Myocardial Strain Assessment Using Feature Tracking
Published on: February 12, 2011
11:50High-frequency High-resolution Echocardiography: First Evidence on Non-invasive Repeated Measure of Myocardial Strain, Contractility, and Mitral Regurgitation in the Ischemia-reperfused Murine Heart
Published on: July 9, 2010