Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 24, 2025

Optimized Management of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke
Published on: January 18, 2018
Urgent Treatment for Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis: The Pittsburgh Revascularization and Treatment Emergently After
Brian T Jankowitz1, Daniel A Tonetti2,3, Cynthia Kenmuir3,4
1Cooper Neurological Institute, Camden, New Jersey.
Insights
Urgent treatment for symptomatic carotid stenosis using either carotid stenting (CAS) or carotid endarterectomy (CEA) showed similar low rates of stroke or death within 30 days for both procedures.
Area of Science:
- Vascular Surgery
- Neurology
- Interventional Cardiology
Background:
- Symptomatic carotid stenosis poses a significant risk of recurrent stroke.
- Early revascularization is crucial but carries risks of periprocedural complications.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare urgent carotid stenting (CAS) versus carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis.
- To analyze outcomes of standardized, rapid treatment protocols.
Main Methods:
- Prospective data from a stroke center protocol for patients within 48 hours of symptom onset.
- Standardized dual-antiplatelet therapy followed by CAS or CEA based on angiography (≥50% stenosis).
- Primary outcome: composite of stroke or death within 30 days.
Main Results:
- 120 patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis were included; 59 underwent CEA, 61 underwent CAS.
- No significant difference in the primary outcome between CEA (5.1%) and CAS (4.9%).
Conclusions:
- Urgent revascularization for symptomatic carotid stenosis is safe and effective.
- Both carotid stenting and carotid endarterectomy offer comparable low risks of stroke or death.
Background:
Patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis remain at high risk of early recurrent stroke without revascularization. This risk must be balanced against a higher rate of periprocedural complications associated with early revascularization.
Objective:
To analyze prospectively recorded data from an institutional protocol that standardized the urgent (<48 h) treatment of patients presenting with symptomatic carotid stenosis and underwent either carotid stenting (CAS) or carotid endarterectomy (CEA).
Methods:
All patients presenting over 28 mo to a comprehensive stroke center with symptomatic carotid stenosis within 48 h of index event were screened for inclusion. All patients were given dual-antiplatelet therapy. If there was clinical equipoise between CEA and CAS, patients underwent angiography and subsequently revascularization if digital subtraction angiography demonstrated ≥50% stenosis. The primary outcome was a composite of stroke or death within 30 d.
Results:
This study included 178 patients with a diagnosis of recently symptomatic carotid stenosis; 120 patients (67%) met the criteria. A total of 59 patients underwent CEA and 61 patients underwent CAS. There were not significant differences in the primary outcome; 3 patients (5.1%) in the CEA arm and 3 patients (4.9%) in the CAS arm met the primary outcome.
Conclusion:
In this prospective analysis, urgent revascularization for symptomatic carotid stenosis can be done with equivalently low rates of stroke or death, regardless of revascularization strategy.
Related Concept Videos
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Pulmonary Embolism II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation IV: Pharmacological Management

