Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 24, 2025
An Anesthesia, Surgery, and Harvest Method for the Evaluation of Transpedicular Screws Using an In Vivo Porcine Lumbar Spine Model
Published on: May 31, 2017
Biomechanical Model Study of the Effect of Partial Facetectomy on Lumbar Stability Under Percutaneous Endoscopy
Xin-Ru Li1, Jia Yu2, Wen Zhang2
1Department of Orthopedics, The Affiliated Changzhou No. 2 People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, Jiangsu, P.R. China.
Objective:
To investigate the effect of partial facetectomy on lumbar stability using percutaneous endoscopy.
Methods:
Five male adult volunteers with no history of lumbar disease participated in the study. Based on computed tomography data, a three-dimensional model of the L3-S1 segment was created using the Mimics l5.0 and Ansys 13.0 software. The use of an 8.5-mm-diameter ring saw was simulated to cut through 5 different needle insertion points (IPs) commonly used in the clinic on the left-side facet joint (FJ) of L5 to perform facetectomy. The first to third IPs were on the apex of the superior FJ, the midpoint of the ventral side of the superior FJ, and the lowest point of the ventral side of the superior FJ. The fourth and fifth IPs represented the positions of the second and third IPs (8.5 mm/2) after the radius of the ring saw was translated to the dorsal side of the superior FJ. Physiologic load was applied to the human models. The pressure on the left and right FJ of the L5 vertebra, the pressure on the L4-5 intervertebral disc, and the range of motion of the lumbar spine were recorded when normal flexion and extension and lateral flexion and rotation of the lumbar spine model after facetectomy were simulated.
Results:
Compared with the intact group, the second IP, maximum pressure on the L4-5 intervertebral disc after facetectomy was not significantly different under any condition (P > 0.05). The maximum pressure on the left FJ of L5 showed significant differences during right rotation of the lumbar spine (P < 0.05). The pressure on the right FJ of L5 was significantly different during left rotation of the lumbar spine (P < 0.05). The range of motion of the lumbar spine was not significantly different under any condition (P > 0.05).
Conclusions:
The second IP at the midpoint of the ventral side of the superior FJ showed minimal effect on lumbar spine biomechanics compared with all the other IPs during percutaneous transforaminal facetectomy. Thus, it can be considered as the most suitable IP for facetectomy.
