Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 24, 2025

A Nonviral Approach to Generate Transient Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cells Using mRNA for Cancer Immunotherapy
Published on: February 21, 2025
Evaluation of Serious Postmarket Safety Signals Within 2 Years of FDA Approval for New Cancer Drugs
Janice Kim1, Abhilasha Nair1, Patricia Keegan1
1Office of Oncologic Diseases, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.
Background:
We examined how often new serious safety signals were identified by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration within the first 2 years after approval for new molecular entities (NMEs) for treatment of cancer that required specific regulatory actions described here.
Methods:
We identified, for all NMEs approved for treatment of cancer or malignant hematology indications between 2010 and 2016, substantial safety-related changes within the first 2 years after approval, which included a new Boxed Warning or Warning and Precaution; requirement for (or modification of existing) Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategies (REMS); and withdrawal from the market because of safety concerns.
Results:
Fifty-five NMEs were approved between 2010 and 2016: 32 (58%) under regular approval (RA) and 23 (42%) under accelerated approval (AA). Of these 55 NMEs, 9 (16%) had substantial safety-related changes after approval. Across all 55 NMEs, one was temporarily withdrawn from the market for safety reasons (1.8%); one (1.8%) required a new REMS; nine required labeling revisions-new Boxed Warnings were required for two NMEs (3.6%), and new Warnings and Precautions subsections were required for eight (14.6%). One drug (ponatinib) was responsible for several of the substantial safety-related changes (withdrawal, REMS, Boxed Warnings). One of 32 NMEs approved under RA required a new Warning and Precaution, whereas 7 of 23 NMEs approved under AA had substantial safety-related changes in the first 2 years after approval.
Conclusion:
Based on our analysis we conclude that although there was a greater incidence of substantial safety-related changes to AA drugs versus RA drugs, the majority of these were changes to the Warnings and Precautions and did not substantially alter the benefit-risk profile of the drug.
Implications For Practice:
The majority of new cancer drugs (84%) approved in the U.S. do not have new substantial safety information being added to the label within the first 2 years of approval. Unprecedented efficacy seen in contemporary cancer drug development has led to early availability of effective cancer therapies based on large effects in smaller populations. More limited premarket safety data require diligent postmarketing safety surveillance as we continue to learn and update drug labeling throughout the product lifecycle.
Insights
Most new cancer drugs (84%) approved in the U.S. show no significant safety label changes within two years. While accelerated approval cancer drugs had more safety updates, these rarely altered the overall benefit-risk profile.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Pharmacovigilance
- Regulatory Science
Background:
- New molecular entities (NMEs) for cancer treatment undergo U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) review.
- Assessing post-approval safety signals is crucial for understanding drug risks.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the frequency of serious safety signals identified by the FDA for cancer NMEs within two years of approval.
- To analyze the types of regulatory actions taken for these NMEs.
Main Methods:
- Identified NMEs approved for cancer or malignant hematology indications between 2010 and 2016.
- Tracked substantial safety-related changes within two years post-approval, including Boxed Warnings, Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategies (REMS), and market withdrawals.
Main Results:
- Of 55 NMEs, 9 (16%) had substantial safety changes within two years.
- Accelerated approval (AA) drugs showed a higher incidence of safety changes (7 of 23) compared to regular approval (RA) drugs (1 of 32).
- One drug, ponatinib, accounted for multiple safety actions.
Conclusions:
- While AA cancer drugs had more safety-related labeling changes, most were minor (Warnings and Precautions) and did not significantly impact the benefit-risk assessment.
- Postmarketing surveillance is vital for updating drug labels as new safety data emerges.
More Related Videos
08:56Simultaneous Imaging and Flow-Cytometry-based Detection of Multiple Fluorescent Senescence Markers in Therapy-Induced Senescent Cancer Cells
Published on: July 12, 2022
10:49Pre-clinical Evaluation of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors for Treatment of Acute Leukemia
Published on: September 18, 2013
Related Concept Videos
Pharmacovigilance
This process, termed pharmacovigilance, aims to detect, evaluate, and minimize harmful effects related to medication use. The data collection for pharmacovigilance depends on spontaneous reporting systems, where healthcare professionals or patients voluntarily report suspected ADRs.
In some cases, there...
FDA Approved Drugs: Changes to Approved Drugs
Clinical Trials: Overview
Drug Regulation
Drug Products: Biologics, Biosimilars and Interchangeables
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...