Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 24, 2025

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
Published on: September 20, 2019
Modified Goldilocks Design with strict type I error control in confirmatory clinical trials
Tianyu Zhan1, Hongtao Zhang2, Alan Hartford3
1Data and Statistical Sciences, AbbVie Inc ., North Chicago, IL, USA.
Modified Goldilocks Design (MGD) analytically controls type I error in adaptive trials, unlike original Goldilocks Design. This Bayesian adaptive design offers similar statistical power for clinical trials.
Area of Science:
- Biostatistics
- Clinical Trial Design
- Bayesian Statistics
Background:
- Goldilocks Design (GD) is a Bayesian adaptive design that uses predictive probability for sample size adaptation.
- GD requires extensive simulations to control Type I error for specific null space subsets, limiting its use in confirmatory trials.
Purpose of the Study:
- To propose a Modified Goldilocks Design (MGD) for adaptive clinical trials.
- To analytically control Type I error across the entire null space, enhancing applicability for confirmatory trials.
Main Methods:
- The MGD applies the conditional invariance principle.
- It utilizes a combination test approach on p-values derived from independent cohorts.
- This method analytically controls Type I error without extensive pre-study simulations.
Main Results:
- The MGD analytically controls Type I error across the entire null space.
- Simulation studies demonstrate that MGD maintains statistical power comparable to the original GD.
- The design was successfully applied to a time-to-event oncology trial.
Conclusions:
- The Modified Goldilocks Design provides an analytical method for Type I error control in Bayesian adaptive trials.
- MGD is a viable alternative to GD for confirmatory trials, offering improved Type I error control with similar power.
- This approach simplifies the design process by reducing reliance on extensive simulations.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
Errors In Hypothesis Tests
Controls in Experiments
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs
Study Design in Statistics
Does aspirin reduce the risk of heart attacks? Is one brand of fertilizer more effective at growing roses than another? Is fatigue as dangerous to a driver as the influence of alcohol? Questions like these are answered using randomized experiments with proper...

