Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 23, 2025

Noninvasive Determination of Vortex Formation Time Using Transesophageal Echocardiography During Cardiac Surgery
Published on: November 28, 2018
Transvalvular Flow Rate Determines Prognostic Value of Aortic Valve Area in Aortic Stenosis
Mayooran Namasivayam1, Wei He2, Timothy W Churchill2
1Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. Electronic address: https://twitter.com/MayoNamasivayam.
Background:
Aortic valve area (AVA) ≤1.0 cm2 is a defining characteristic of severe aortic stenosis (AS). AVA can be underestimated at low transvalvular flow rate. Yet, the impact of flow rate on prognostic value of AVA ≤1.0 cm2 is unknown and is not incorporated into AS assessment.
Objectives:
This study aimed to evaluate the effect of flow rate on prognostic value of AVA in AS.
Methods:
In total, 1,131 patients with moderate or severe AS and complete clinical follow-up were included as part of a longitudinal database. The effect of flow rate (ratio of stroke volume to ejection time) on prognostic value of AVA ≤1.0 cm2 for time to death was evaluated, adjusting for confounders. Sensitivity analysis was performed to identify the optimal cutoff for prognostic threshold of AVA. The findings were validated in a separate external longitudinal cohort of 939 patients.
Results:
Flow rate had a significant effect on prognostic value of AVA. AVA ≤1.0 cm2 was not prognostic for mortality (p = 0.15) if AVA was measured at flow rates below median (≤242 ml/s). In contrast, AVA ≤1.0 cm2 was highly prognostic for mortality (p = 0.003) if AVA was measured at flow rates above median (>242 ml/s). Findings were irrespective of multivariable adjustment for age, sex, and surgical/transcatheter aortic valve replacement (as time-dependent covariates); comorbidities; medications; and echocardiographic features. AVA ≤1.0 cm2 was also not an independent predictor of mortality below median flow rate in the validation cohort. The optimal flow rate cutoff for prognostic threshold was 210 ml/s.
Conclusions:
Transvalvular flow rate determines prognostic value of AVA in AS. AVA measured at low flow rate is not a good prognostic marker and therefore not a good diagnostic marker for truly severe AS. Flow rate assessment should be incorporated into clinical diagnosis, classification, and prognosis of AS.
Related Concept Videos
Aortic Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Aortic Regurgitation I: Introduction
Mitral Stenosis I: Introduction
Mitral Stenosis IV: Nursing Management
Mitral Stenosis II: Clinical features and Diagnostic Tests

