Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 23, 2025

Closure of a Patent Foramen Ovale PFO: An Intervention Sequence
Published on: December 23, 2022
Patent foramen ovale
Vafa Alakbarzade1, Tracey Keteepe-Arachi2, Nazia Karsan2
1Neurology, Royal Cornwall Hospitals NHS Trust, Truro, UK vafa.alakbarzade.10@ucl.ac.uk.
Abstract:
Patent foramen ovale (PFO) is the most common anatomical cause of an interatrial shunt. It is usually asymptomatic but may cause paradoxical embolism, manifesting as stroke, myocardial infarction or visceral/peripheral ischaemia. PFO is a risk factor for stroke and may be associated with migraine with aura. New evidence suggests PFO closure reduces the risk of recurrent ischaemic stroke in a highly selected population of stroke survivors: those aged 60 years or younger with a cryptogenic stroke syndrome, a large right-to-left shunt, an atrial septal aneurysm and no evidence of atrial fibrillation. They benefit from percutaneous PFO closure in addition to antiplatelet therapy, rather than antiplatelet therapy alone. Current evidence does not support PFO closure in the treatment of migraine.
Insights
Patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure can reduce recurrent stroke risk in select younger patients with cryptogenic strokes. This intervention, combined with antiplatelet therapy, shows benefit over antiplatelet therapy alone for these specific individuals.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Neurology
- Vascular Medicine
Background:
- Patent foramen ovale (PFO) is a common heart defect causing an interatrial shunt.
- PFO can lead to paradoxical embolism, resulting in stroke, myocardial infarction, or ischemia.
- PFO is a recognized risk factor for stroke and may be linked to migraine with aura.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy of percutaneous PFO closure in preventing recurrent ischemic stroke.
- To identify specific patient subgroups who benefit from PFO closure.
- To compare PFO closure plus antiplatelet therapy versus antiplatelet therapy alone.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of new evidence on PFO closure in stroke survivors.
- Focus on a highly selected population: patients ≤60 years with cryptogenic stroke, large right-to-left shunt, atrial septal aneurysm, and no atrial fibrillation.
- Comparison of outcomes between percutaneous PFO closure plus antiplatelet therapy and antiplatelet therapy alone.
Main Results:
- Percutaneous PFO closure, when added to antiplatelet therapy, reduces the risk of recurrent ischemic stroke in a carefully selected group of younger stroke survivors.
- This benefit is observed in patients with specific criteria including cryptogenic stroke syndrome, large shunts, and atrial septal aneurysm.
- Current evidence does not support PFO closure for migraine treatment.
Conclusions:
- PFO closure is a beneficial adjunctive therapy for specific young stroke survivors to prevent recurrent ischemic events.
- Patient selection is critical for successful PFO closure outcomes.
- PFO closure is not indicated for migraine management based on current data.
Related Concept Videos
Fetal Circulation
Two umbilical arteries transport blood from the fetus to the placenta. At the placenta, the blood absorbs oxygen and nutrients while simultaneously eliminating waste products. This oxygen-enriched and nutrient-rich blood then returns to the fetus through one...
Chambers of the Heart
Deoxygenated blood from the body is received in the right...
Development of the Heart
As the embryo undergoes lateral folding, these paired tubes approach each other, merging into a single primitive heart...
Mitral Regurgitation I: Introduction
Cardiovascular System Abnormal Findings II: Auscultation
Abnormal Heart Sounds
Gallops:
Aortic Regurgitation I: Introduction

