Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 23, 2025

Development of a Benchtop Model for Evaluating the Compatibility of Wound Dressing Materials with Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Systems
Published on: May 2, 2025
Evaluating the Impact of an Innovative Educational Program for Skin Care Champions Using the Pieper-Zulkowski
Barbara Delmore1, Daniel J Smith, Elizabeth Savage
1At NYU Langone Health in New York, Barbara Delmore, PhD, RN, CWCN, MAPWCA, IIWCC-NYU, is Senior Nurse Scientist, Center for Innovations in the Advancement of Care and Clinical Assistant Professor, Hansjörg Wyss Department of Plastic Surgery; Daniel J. Smith, MA, is Data Analyst/Research Coordinator, Center for Innovations in the Advancement of Care; and Elizabeth Savage, MSN, APRN, ACNS-BC, CWON, IIWCC-NYU, is Program Manager, Wound & Ostomy Program. Elizabeth A. Ayello, PhD, RN, MS, BSN, CWON, ETN, MAPWCA, FAAN, is Co-Editor-in-Chief, Advances in Skin & Wound Care, and Faculty, Excelsior College, School of Nursing, New York, New York.
Objective:
To assess pressure injury knowledge of Skin Care Council nursing members using the Pieper-Zulkowski Pressure Ulcer Knowledge Test (PZ-PUKT), to design an educational intervention informed by the results of the baseline assessment, and to evaluate the effect of the intervention.
Methods:
This was a single-group pretest-posttest project conducted in an urban, academic, tertiary medical center from January to August 2017. Participants were measured on the pretest, received the intervention, and then were reevaluated on the posttest 3 months later. Pretest results informed the design of the intervention, which was a 1-day interactive, targeted educational program referred to as the "Skin Care Council Boot Camp." Paired-samples t tests were conducted to examine differences between pretest and posttest scores on the PZ-PUKT overall and in each test section.
Results:
Seventy-seven participants enrolled in the project and completed the pretest. Of those, 58 (75.3%) were retained through the intervention and the posttest evaluation. Participants had a mean pretest score of 78.9 and a mean posttest score of 85.3. There were significant mean differences among pretest and posttest PZ-PUKT scores: 6.4 (t = 9.419, P < .001) overall; 4.6 (t = 5.356, P < .001) in the Prevention/Risk category; 4.1 (t = 3.668, P < .001) in the Staging category; and 10.5 (t = 7.938, P < .001) in the Wound Description category.
Conclusions:
By testing pressure injury knowledge before developing a program, investigators created a tailored, education program that addressed knowledge gaps. Posttest results provided insight into the program's success and opportunities for future improvement.
More Related Videos
06:28E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
Published on: August 1, 2019
05:04Author Spotlight: Evaluating Clinicians' Adoption of Ultrasound-Guided Vascular Cannulation Through Simulation Training
Published on: August 9, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Methods of Documentation III: PIE
Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation
Nurses can use several methods to evaluate patient outcomes. For example, oral questions can assess cognitive learning,...
Nursing Evaluation