Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 23, 2025

11:05
Tissue-simulating Phantoms for Assessing Potential Near-infrared Fluorescence Imaging Applications in Breast Cancer Surgery
Published on: September 19, 2014
12.6K
Performance test methods for near-infrared fluorescence imaging.
Udayakumar Kanniyappan1,2, Bohan Wang1, Charles Yang1
1Fischell Department of Bioengineering, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA.
Medical Physics
|April 19, 2020
Summary
This study developed standardized phantom-based methods for evaluating near-infrared fluorescence (NIRF) imaging systems. These techniques enable quantitative assessment of image quality, crucial for advancing diagnostic and research applications.
Area of Science:
- Medical Imaging
- Biophotonics
- Optical Diagnostics
Background:
- Near-infrared fluorescence (NIRF) imaging is vital for visualizing vasculature and detecting cancer using targeted or untargeted agents.
- Standardization of NIRF imaging technologies is needed for objective, quantitative testing of image quality characteristics.
- Developing rigorous test methods applicable to diverse devices is essential for reliable performance evaluation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To establish best practices for objective, quantitative testing of key image quality characteristics in NIRF imaging.
- To develop a comprehensive battery of test methods for evaluating wide-field fluorescence imagers.
- To facilitate the development of international standards for fluorescence image quality assessment.
Main Methods:
- Evaluated methods for phantom design, measurement, and calculation of performance metrics for NIRF imaging systems.
- Utilized a NIRF system (780 nm excitation, >830 nm detection) with indocyanine green.
- Employed multiwell plate, high turbidity planar, and 3D-printed multichannel phantoms, alongside a USAF 1951 resolution target.
Main Results:
- Developed and demonstrated a cohesive battery of test methods for assessing fluorescence image quality in wide-field imagers.
- Explored techniques to evaluate uniformity, field of view, spectral crosstalk, spatial resolution, depth of field, sensitivity, linearity, and penetration depth.
- Proposed key metrics for direct, quantitative comparison of device performance.
Conclusions:
- The developed methods provide a framework for uniform evaluation and inter-comparison of clinical and preclinical NIRF imaging systems.
- These techniques address the need for standardization in NIRF imaging technologies.
- The long-term goal is to establish international standards for fluorescence image quality assessment.
Related Concept Videos
Photoluminescence: Applications
917
Photoluminescence offers a wide range of applications due to its inherent sensitivity and selectivity. This technique allows for both direct and indirect analyses of the analyte. Direct quantitative analysis is possible when the analyte exhibits a favorable quantum yield for fluorescence or phosphorescence. However, an indirect analysis may be feasible if the analyte is not fluorescent or phosphorescent, or if the quantum yield is unfavorable. Indirect methods include reacting the analyte with...
917
Fluorescence and Phosphorescence: Instrumentation
1.3K
Fluorometers and spectrofluorometers are two types of instruments used for measuring molecular fluorescence. These instruments differ in how they select excitation and emission wavelengths and the type of light sources they utilize. Fluorometers use absorption interference filters to choose excitation and emission wavelengths. The excitation source in a fluorometer is typically a low-pressure mercury vapor lamp that emits intense lines distributed throughout the ultraviolet and visible regions.
1.3K

