Effect of probiotics on thymus size and markers of infection in late infancy: a randomized controlled trial

Anni Larnkjær1, Kim F Michaelsen2, Maren J H Rytter2,3

  • 1Department of Nutrition, Exercise and Sports, Faculty of Science, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark. ala@nexs.ku.dk.

Pediatric Research
|April 20, 2020
PubMed

Insights

Probiotics did not significantly alter thymus size or CRP levels in Danish infants starting daycare. Thymus size showed inverse associations with CRP and certain infections, warranting further investigation.

Area of Science:

  • Immunology
  • Pediatrics
  • Microbiology

Background:

  • Probiotics are known immune system modulators.
  • The impact of probiotics on thymus size in late infancy remains under-explored.
  • Infants starting daycare face increased infection exposure during immune development.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the effect of a specific probiotic combination on thymus size and C-reactive protein (CRP) in healthy Danish infants.
  • To explore associations between thymus size, CRP, and recent infections in this age group.

Main Methods:

  • 186 healthy Danish infants were randomized to receive a probiotic (Lactobacillus rhamnosus, LGG® and Bifidobacterium animalis spp. lactis, BB-12®) or placebo for 6 months.
  • Thymus size was assessed using ultrasound (thymus index and thymus weight index).
  • C-reactive protein (CRP) levels and parent-reported infections were recorded.

Main Results:

  • No significant differences in thymus size or CRP were observed between the probiotic and placebo groups.
  • A trend suggested a 5% higher thymus weight index in the probiotic group (p=0.068).
  • Thymus size was inversely associated with CRP, diarrhea, and absence from daycare due to infections.

Conclusions:

  • Probiotic supplementation did not impact thymus size or CRP in Danish infants starting daycare.
  • While no direct effect was found, thymus size correlated with infection markers, suggesting a link between immune status and thymus size in early childhood.
Abstract