Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 23, 2025

Spatiotemporal Control of Protein Activity through Optogenetic Allosteric Regulation
Published on: October 4, 2024
The spatiotemporal control of human matriptase action on its physiological substrates: a case against a direct role
Chen-Yong Lin1, Jehng-Kang Wang2, Michael D Johnson3
1Department of Oncology, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University School of Medicine, W412 Research Building 3970 Reservoir Road NW, Washington, DC, 20057, USA. lincy@georgetown.edu.
Abstract:
Studies of human genetic disorders and animal models indicate that matriptase plays essential roles in proteolytic processes associated with profilaggrin processing and desquamation at late stages of epidermal differentiation. The tissue distribution profile and zymogen activation status in human skin, however, suggests that matriptase physiological function in the skin more likely lies in the proliferating and differentiating keratinocytes in the basal and spinous layers. Marked acanthosis with expanded spinous layer and lack of significant changes in intensity and expression pattern for several terminal differentiation markers in the skin of ARIH patients support matriptase's role in earlier rather than the later stages of differentiation. In addition to the tissue distribution, differential subcellular localization further limits the ability of extracellular matriptase proteolytic activity to access the cytosolic non-membrane-bound keratohyalin granules, in which profilaggrin processing occurs. The short lifespan of active matriptase, which results from tightly controlled zymogen activation, rapid inhibition by HAI-1, and shedding from cell surface, indicates that active matriptase likely performs physiological functions via limited proteolysis on its substrates, as needed, rather than via a continuous bulk process. We, here, review these spatiotemporal controls of matriptase proteolytic activity at the biochemical, cellular, and tissue level. Based on this in-depth understanding of how matriptase activity is regulated, we argue that there is no direct involvement of matriptase proteolytic activity in profilaggrin processing and desquamation. The defects in epidermal terminal differentiation associated with matriptase deficiency are likely secondary and are due to putative disruption at earlier stages of differentiation.
More Related Videos
07:26Isolation of Whole Cell Protein Lysates from Mouse Facial Processes and Cultured Palatal Mesenchyme Cells for Phosphoprotein Analysis
Published on: April 1, 2022
06:57Analysis of Transforming Growth Factor ß Family Cleavage Products Secreted Into the Blastocoele of Xenopus laevis Embryos
Published on: July 21, 2021
Related Concept Videos
Role of Matrix Metalloproteases in Degradation of ECM
Cytoskeletal Linker Proteins - Plakins
Intracellular Signaling Affects Focal Adhesions
Some...
Cell Motility through Blebbing
Blebbing Through the Matrix
In multicellular...
Mechanism of Lamellipodia Formation
Mechanism of Filopodia Formation
Their main function is to guide migrating cells during normal tissue morphogenesis or cancer metastasis by recognizing and making initial contacts with the extracellular matrix. However, they can also act as stationary cell anchors or help to establish communication...