Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 23, 2025

Generation and Coherent Control of Pulsed Quantum Frequency Combs
Published on: June 8, 2018
Vibronic Quantum Beating between Electronic Excited States in a Heterodimer
V M Freixas1, S Tretiak2, D V Makhov3,4
1Departamento de Ciencia y Tecnologia, Universidad Nacional de Quilmes/CONICET, B1876BXD Bernal, Argentina.
Abstract:
Energy transfer in multichromophoric molecules can be affected by coherences that are induced by the electronic and vibrational couplings between chromophore units. Coherent electron-vibrational dynamics can persist at the subpicosecond time scale even at room temperature. Furthermore, wave-like localized-delocalized motions of the electronic wave function can be modulated by vibrations that actively participate in the intermolecular energy transfer process. Herein, nonadiabatic excited state molecular dynamics simulations have been performed on a rigid synthetic heterodimer that has been proposed as a simplified model for investigating the role and mechanism of coherent energy transfer in multichromophoric systems. Both surface hopping (SH) and Ehrenfest approaches (EHR) have been considered. After photoexcitation of the system at room temperature, EHR simulations reveal an ultrafast beating of electronic populations between the two lowest electronic states. These oscillations are not observed at low temperature and have vibrational origins. Furthermore, they cannot be reproduced using SH approach. This periodic behavior of electronic populations induces oscillations in the spatial localization of the electronic transition density between monomers. Vibrations whose frequencies are near-resonant with energy difference between the two lowest electronic excited states are in the range of the electronic population beating, and they are the ones that contribute the most to the coherent dynamics of these electronic transitions.
Related Concept Videos
Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)
The extent of coupling depends on the C‑C bond length, the two H‑C‑C angles, any electron-withdrawing substituents, and the dihedral angle between the involved orbitals. The...
Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
π Electron Effects on Chemical Shift: Overview
¹H NMR Signal Multiplicity: Splitting Patterns
Spin–Spin Coupling Constant: Overview
Qualitatively, any spin plus-half nucleus polarizes the spins of its electrons to the minus-half state. Consequently, the paired electron in the hydrogen–carbon bond must...
¹H NMR: Interpreting Distorted and Overlapping Signals
As Δν decreases and the signals move closer, the doublets appear increasingly distorted. The intensities of the inner lines increase at the cost of those of the outer lines as the signals are...

