Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Evolutionary Psychology01:20

Evolutionary Psychology

813
Evolutionary psychology explores the origins of human behavior and mental processes by framing them within the context of natural selection, a theory famously propounded by Charles Darwin. This field asserts that many behaviors common across human societies — ranging from instinctive fear reactions to complex social interactions — arose as evolutionary adaptations. These adaptations enhanced the survival and reproductive success of our ancestors, thereby becoming embedded in the...
813
What is Evolutionary History?02:35

What is Evolutionary History?

42.7K
Scientists record evolutionary history by analyzing fossil, morphological, and genetic data. The fossil record documents the history of life on Earth and provides evidence for evolution. However, both fossil and living organisms offer evidence that outlines Earth’s evolutionary history.
42.7K
Convergent Evolution01:54

Convergent Evolution

31.2K
Evolution shapes the features of organisms over time, ensuring that they are suited for the environments in which they live. Sometimes, selection pressure leads to the rise of similar but unrelated adaptations in organisms with no recent common ancestors, a process known as convergent evolution.
31.2K
Eukaryotic Evolution01:24

Eukaryotic Evolution

39.9K
The endosymbiont theory is the most widely accepted theory of eukaryotic evolution; however, its progression is still somewhat debated. According to the nucleus-first hypothesis, the ancestral prokaryote first evolved a membrane to enclose DNA and form the nucleus. Conversely, the mitochondria-first hypothesis suggests that the nucleus was formed after endosymbiosis of mitochondria.
Contrary to the endosymbiont theory, the eukaryote-first hypothesis proposes that the simpler prokaryotic and...
39.9K
Speciation Rates01:07

Speciation Rates

22.5K
Overview
22.5K
Cooperative Allosteric Transitions01:58

Cooperative Allosteric Transitions

2.6K
2.6K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Lineage priming and cell type proportioning depends on the interplay between stochastic and deterministic factors.

eLife·2026
Same author

Managing pesticide resistance by changing the applied dose: a modeling analysis incorporating pesticide persistence and including low-dose mixtures.

Journal of economic entomology·2026
Same author

The Evolution of Pesticide Resistance: A Data-Driven Case Study of Chlorantraniliprole Resistance in <i>Chilo suppressalis</i> and Other Lepidopteran Pests in China.

Evolutionary applications·2025
Same author

What is the value of rotations to insecticide resistance management?

Pest management science·2024
Same author

Bivariate GWAS reveals pleiotropic regions among feed efficiency and beef quality-related traits in Nelore cattle.

Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society·2022
Same author

Beyond redundant kill: A fundamental explanation of how insecticide mixtures work for resistance management.

Pest management science·2022

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 23, 2025

New Variations for Strategy Set-shifting in the Rat
09:45

New Variations for Strategy Set-shifting in the Rat

Published on: January 23, 2017

8.5K

Evolution of strategic cooperation.

P G Madgwick1, J B Wolf1

  • 1Milner Centre for Evolution, Department of Biology and Biochemistry University of Bath Bath BA2 7AY United Kingdom.

Evolution Letters
|April 22, 2020
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Strategic cooperation in groups presents a paradox. While relatedness benefits groups, highly related individuals may have lower fitness due to cooperation costs, challenging evolutionary theory.

Keywords:
Cooperationgroup selectionkin selectionpublic goodssocial behavior

More Related Videos

Spatial Multiobjective Optimization of Agricultural Conservation Practices using a SWAT Model and an Evolutionary Algorithm
11:53

Spatial Multiobjective Optimization of Agricultural Conservation Practices using a SWAT Model and an Evolutionary Algorithm

Published on: December 9, 2012

13.3K
Author Spotlight: Advancing Protein Engineering &#8211; Harnessing Evolution Through PRANCE and Lab Automation
05:08

Author Spotlight: Advancing Protein Engineering – Harnessing Evolution Through PRANCE and Lab Automation

Published on: January 12, 2024

2.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 23, 2025

New Variations for Strategy Set-shifting in the Rat
09:45

New Variations for Strategy Set-shifting in the Rat

Published on: January 23, 2017

8.5K
Spatial Multiobjective Optimization of Agricultural Conservation Practices using a SWAT Model and an Evolutionary Algorithm
11:53

Spatial Multiobjective Optimization of Agricultural Conservation Practices using a SWAT Model and an Evolutionary Algorithm

Published on: December 9, 2012

13.3K
Author Spotlight: Advancing Protein Engineering &#8211; Harnessing Evolution Through PRANCE and Lab Automation
05:08

Author Spotlight: Advancing Protein Engineering – Harnessing Evolution Through PRANCE and Lab Automation

Published on: January 12, 2024

2.1K

Area of Science:

  • Evolutionary biology
  • Game theory
  • Behavioral ecology

Background:

  • Group-beneficial behaviors pose challenges for evolutionary theory due to individual costs and shared benefits.
  • The potential for

Purpose of the Study:

  • To model strategic cooperation where individuals adjust contributions to group-beneficial behaviors based on social context.
  • To investigate the evolutionary dynamics of cooperation and cheating in social groups.

Main Methods:

  • Developed an evolutionary game model to simulate strategic cooperation.
  • Players quantitatively adjust their contributions to group-beneficial actions.

Main Results:

  • The evolutionarily stable strategy (ESS) suggests contributions align with relatedness to the group.
  • Surprisingly, higher relatedness can lead to lower individual fitness due to cooperation dynamics.
  • Cooperation equalizes fitness returns, diminishing the advantage of high relatedness.

Conclusions:

  • Groups with higher relatedness may not be evolutionarily optimal for individual fitness.
  • A paradox exists where group success is linked to relatedness, but individual fitness within the group is inversely related.
  • Strategic cooperation dynamics can lead to unexpected fitness outcomes for individuals within social groups.