Risk Stratification of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia According to Different Prognostic Scores

Introduction Several prognostic indices are in use to stratify chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients: Sokal, Hasford, and the European Treatment and Outcome Study (EUTOS) being the most commonly reported ones. The application of different scores may cause variability in the determination of disease prognosis. This study was conducted to stratify patients of CML in accordance with Sokal, Hasford, and EUTOS scoring systems and to determine the concordance rate of risk categories, calculated by using all three scoring systems. Methods This study was conducted at King Edward Medical University from January 2013 to May 2019. A total of 114 patients were diagnosed with CML in the chronic phase during the study period and included in the analysis. Variables of interest were computed using Microsoft Excel. These variables include age, spleen size, platelet count, the percentage of myeloblasts in the peripheral blood, as well as the percentage of basophils and eosinophils in the peripheral blood. Using these baseline variables, the prognostic category of each patient was calculated using Sokal, Hasford, and EUTOS scores. Results The male to female ratio of patients included in the study was 1.43. The mean age was 39.3±1.58 years, with an age range of 13 to 95 years. A total of only 4 out of 73 patients were categorized as a low-risk category, whereas 23 out of 80 patients were categorized into a high-risk category by all three scoring systems. The assignment of prognostic categories was variable, depending on which prognostic score was applied. The concordance rate of Sokal vs Hasford was 53%, Sokal vs EUTOS 64%, and Hasford vs EUTOS 98%. Conclusion There is considerable inter-variability between the various prognostic indicators. In general, the Hasford and EUTOS scores assign some patients to a lower risk category when compared to Sokal score.