Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Protein Complex Assembly02:41

Protein Complex Assembly

2.5K
2.5K
Improving Translational Accuracy02:07

Improving Translational Accuracy

3.4K
3.4K
Improving Translational Accuracy02:07

Improving Translational Accuracy

13.9K
Base complementarity between the three base pairs of mRNA codon and the tRNA anticodon is not a failsafe mechanism. Inaccuracies can range from a single mismatch to no correct base pairing at all. The free energy difference between the correct and nearly correct base pairs can be as small as 3 kcal/ mol. With complementarity being the only proofreading step, the estimated error frequency would be one wrong amino acid in every 100 amino acids incorporated. However, error frequencies observed in...
13.9K
Genome Annotation and Assembly03:36

Genome Annotation and Assembly

20.4K
The genome refers to all of the genetic material in an organism. It can range from a few million base pairs in microbial cells to several billion base pairs in many eukaryotic organisms. Genome assembly refers to the process of taking the DNA sequencing data and putting it all back together in a correct order to create a close representation of the original genome. This is followed by the identification of functional elements on the newly assembled genome, a process called genome annotation.
20.4K
Transfer RNA Synthesis02:35

Transfer RNA Synthesis

3.4K
3.4K
Alternative RNA Splicing02:18

Alternative RNA Splicing

4.6K
4.6K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Ten simple rules for writing a peer review.

PLoS computational biology·2026
Same author

Molecular cues from distinct neuron classes drive differential myelination in the neocortex.

Developmental cell·2026
Same author

Data-driven AI system for learning how to run transcript assemblers.

Genome biology·2026
Same author

CodonMoE: DNA language models for codon-dependent mRNA prediction.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2026
Same author

Integrating Long-Read Structural Variant Analysis with single-nucleus RNA-seq to Elucidate Gene Expression Effects in Disease.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

<i>In vivo</i> multiomic Perturb-seq with enhanced nuclear gRNA capture.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same journal

GMSA: A Graph Matching and Point Cloud Registration-Based Method for Spatial Transcriptomics Data Alignment.

Journal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology·2026
Same journal

Investigations on Multiple Protein Scaffold Filling.

Journal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology·2026
Same journal

Cell Type Prediction for Single-Cell RNA Sequencing Utilizing Unsupervised Domain Adaptation and Semi-Supervised Learning.

Journal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology·2026
Same journal

PPIGAN: Prediction of Protein-Protein Interactions Using Generative Adversarial Networks.

Journal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology·2026
Same journal

Deep Structure-Enhanced Cell Clustering Model for Single-Cell RNA Sequencing Data.

Journal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology·2026
Same journal

Asymmetric Drug-Drug Interaction Prediction Based on Generative Adversarial Networks and Knowledge Graph.

Journal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 23, 2025

A Computational Pipeline for Intergenic/Intragenic Enhancer RNA Quantification in Mouse Embryonic Stem Cells
06:02

A Computational Pipeline for Intergenic/Intragenic Enhancer RNA Quantification in Mouse Embryonic Stem Cells

Published on: October 28, 2025

322

More Accurate Transcript Assembly via Parameter Advising.

Dan Deblasio1,2, Kwanho Kim1,3, Carl Kingsford1

  • 1Computational Biology Department, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.

Journal of Computational Biology : a Journal of Computational Molecular Cell Biology
|April 22, 2020
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Automating genomic analysis is crucial as software becomes complex. This study developed a method to automatically select optimal parameters for transcript assembly, significantly improving accuracy for tools like Scallop and StringTie.

Keywords:
automated bioinformaticsgenomicsparameter advisingtranscript assembly

More Related Videos

Leveraging CyVerse Resources for De Novo Comparative Transcriptomics of Underserved Non-model Organisms
10:41

Leveraging CyVerse Resources for De Novo Comparative Transcriptomics of Underserved Non-model Organisms

Published on: May 9, 2017

9.5K
Identification of Alternative Splicing and Polyadenylation in RNA-seq Data
08:35

Identification of Alternative Splicing and Polyadenylation in RNA-seq Data

Published on: June 24, 2021

6.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 23, 2025

A Computational Pipeline for Intergenic/Intragenic Enhancer RNA Quantification in Mouse Embryonic Stem Cells
06:02

A Computational Pipeline for Intergenic/Intragenic Enhancer RNA Quantification in Mouse Embryonic Stem Cells

Published on: October 28, 2025

322
Leveraging CyVerse Resources for De Novo Comparative Transcriptomics of Underserved Non-model Organisms
10:41

Leveraging CyVerse Resources for De Novo Comparative Transcriptomics of Underserved Non-model Organisms

Published on: May 9, 2017

9.5K
Identification of Alternative Splicing and Polyadenylation in RNA-seq Data
08:35

Identification of Alternative Splicing and Polyadenylation in RNA-seq Data

Published on: June 24, 2021

6.2K

Area of Science:

  • Genomics
  • Bioinformatics
  • Computational Biology

Background:

  • Genomic analysis software is increasingly complex with numerous tunable parameters.
  • Parameter choice significantly impacts the accuracy of genomic analysis results, particularly transcript assembly.
  • Existing tools often rely on default parameters, which may not be optimal for specific datasets.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To quantify the impact of parameter choice on transcript assembly accuracy.
  • To develop a method for automatically selecting input-specific parameter values for reference-based transcript assembly.
  • To improve the automation of genomic analysis pipelines.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a method for automatic parameter value selection for the Scallop transcript assembly tool.
  • Evaluated the method on 1595 RNA-Seq samples from the Sequence Read Archive.
  • Assessed the generalizability of the approach by applying it to the StringTie tool using 65 ENCODE RNA-Seq experiments.

Main Results:

  • Automatic parameter selection for Scallop increased the area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC) by an average of 28.9% compared to default parameters.
  • Applying the approach to StringTie improved AUC by an average of 13.1%.
  • The developed method demonstrates a significant improvement in transcript assembly accuracy through automated parameter optimization.

Conclusions:

  • Automated, input-specific parameter selection is effective in enhancing the accuracy of genomic analysis tools.
  • This approach represents a step towards fully automated genomic analysis pipelines.
  • Parameter advisors for Scallop and StringTie are publicly available to facilitate adoption.