Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 23, 2025
A Whole Body Dosimetry Protocol for Peptide-Receptor Radionuclide Therapy PRRT: 2D Planar Image and Hybrid 2D+3D SPECT/CT Image Methods
Published on: April 24, 2020
Biomechanical modeling of radiation dose-induced volumetric changes of the parotid glands for deformable image
Molly M McCulloch1,2, Guillaume Cazoulat1, Alexandra C Ford1
1Department of Imaging Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, United States of America.
Purpose:
Early animal studies suggest that parotid gland (PG) toxicity prediction could be improved by an accurate estimation of the radiation dose to sub-regions of the PG. Translation to clinical investigation requires voxel-level dose accumulation in this organ that responds volumetrically throughout treatment. To date, deformable image registration (DIR) has been evaluated for the PG using only surface alignment. We sought to develop and evaluate an advanced DIR technique capable of modeling these complex PG volume changes over the course of radiation therapy.
Materials And Methods:
Planning and mid-treatment magnetic resonance images from 19 patients and computed tomography images from nine patients who underwent radiation therapy for head and neck cancer were retrospectively evaluated. A finite element model (FEM)-based DIR algorithm was applied between the corresponding pairs of images, based on boundary conditions on the PG surfaces only (Morfeus-spatial). To investigate an anticipated improvement in accuracy, we added a population model-based thermal expansion coefficient to simulate the dose distribution effect on the volume change inside the glands (Morfeus-spatialDose). The model accuracy was quantified using target registration error for magnetic resonance images, where corresponding anatomical landmarks could be identified. The potential clinical impact was evaluated using differences in mean dose, median dose, D98, and D50 of the PGs.
Results:
In the magnetic resonance images, the mean (±standard deviation) target registration error significantly reduced by 0.25 ± 0.38 mm (p = 0.01) when using Morfeus-spatialDose instead of Morfeus-spatial. In the computed tomography images, differences in the mean dose, median dose, D98, and D50 of the PGs reached 2.9 ± 0.8, 3.8, 4.1, and 3.8 Gy, respectively, between Morfeus-spatial and Morfeus-spatialDose.
Conclusion:
Differences between Morfeus-spatial and Morfeus-spatialDose may be impactful when considering high-dose gradients of radiation in the PGs. The proposed DIR model can allow more accurate PG alignment than the standard model and improve dose estimation and toxicity prediction modeling.
