Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 23, 2025

Quantified Assessment of Infant's Gross Motor Abilities Using a Multisensor Wearable
Published on: May 17, 2024
Construct validity of the Motor Development Scale (MDS)
Paola Matiko Martins Okuda1, Erika Félix1, Hugo Cogo-Moreira1,2
1Departamento de Psiquiatria e Psicologia Médica, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Insights
The Motor Development Scale (MDS) demonstrates construct validity for assessing motor development in Brazilian children aged 4 to 6 years. This unidimensional model offers a reliable and concise evaluation tool for this age group.
Area of Science:
- Child Development
- Motor Skills Assessment
- Psychometrics
Background:
- Construct validity for the Motor Development Scale (MDS) has not been previously established.
- Assessing motor development in young children is crucial for early identification of potential issues.
Purpose of the Study:
- To examine the appropriateness of a unidimensional model for the MDS in Brazilian children aged 4 to 6 years.
- To provide construct validity evidence for the MDS items in this specific age cohort.
Main Methods:
- A total of 938 children (214 4-year-olds, 643 5-year-olds, 81 6-year-olds) participated.
- Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was employed to evaluate the unidimensional model's fit and construct validity.
Main Results:
- The CFA indicated excellent model fit across all age groups (4, 5, and 6 years) with strong adequacy indices.
- Reliability analysis showed good internal consistency (omega = 0.87).
Conclusions:
- The unidimensional solution for the MDS is appropriate for assessing motor development in children aged 4 to 6 years.
- The MDS provides a concise, parsimonious, and reliable measure for this population.
Objective:
Construct validity for the Motor Development Scale (MDS) has not been established. The aim of this study was to examine whether the unidimensional model of MDS would be appropriate for children aged 4 to 6 years-old and provide construct validity for the items concerning this age group in Brazil.
Methods:
A total of 938 children participated in the study (214 4-year-olds, 643 5-year-olds, and 81 6-year-olds). Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was used to evaluate construct validity of the MDS using a unidimensional model.
Results:
The CFA for the unidimensional model showed excellent adequacy indices for age 4: χ2(2) = 0.581, p = 0.748, comparative fit index (CFI) = 1.000, Tucker-Lewis index (TLI) = 1.090, root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) = 0.000 (90% confidence interval [90%CI] = 0.000 to 0.093, close fit [Cfit] = 0.841); age 5: χ2(2) = 2.669, p = 0.263, CFI = 0.993, TLI = 0.980, RMSEA = 0.023 (90%CI = 0.000 to 0.085, Cfit = 0.682), weighted root mean square residual (WRMR) = 0.407; and age 6: χ2(9) = 8.275, p = 0.506, CFI = 1.000, TLI = 1.010, RMSEA = 0.000 (90%CI = 0.000 to 0.118, Cfit = 0.653), WRMR = 0.495. Reliability was good: ω = 0.87 (95%CI = 0.81 to 0.92).
Conclusion:
The proposed unidimensional solution for the MDS provides a concise, parsimonious and reliable way to assess motor development in children aged 4 to 6 years.
Related Concept Videos
Hierarchy of Motor Control
Three Developmental Domains
Physical Development
Physical processes, also known as maturation, encompass the biological changes that occur across an individual's life. These changes begin with genetic inheritance and continue through various stages, including growth in height and weight,...
Piaget's Stage 1 of Cognitive Development
Exploration...
Reliability and Validity
Introduction to Developmental Psychology
Wechsler's Contribution to Measures of Intelligence

