Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 23, 2025

A Multicenter MRI Protocol for the Evaluation and Quantification of Deep Vein Thrombosis
Published on: June 2, 2015
Resolution times of endovenous heat-induced thrombosis
Pavel Kibrik1, Jesse Chait1, Michael Arustamyan1
1Vascular Institute of New York, Brooklyn, NY.
Objective:
Lower extremity endovenous ablation has become the primary treatment modality for symptomatic venous reflux disease. Endovenous heat-induced thrombosis (EHIT) has been reported as one of the primary complications of these venous ablative procedures. Our aim was to determine how long EHITs take to resolve and the factors affecting this length of time.
Methods:
A retrospective analysis was performed of 10,029 consecutive procedures from March 2012 to September 2018 performed on 3218 patients who underwent endovenous ablation for lower extremity venous reflux. There were 6091 procedures performed with radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and 3938 with endovenous laser ablation (EVLA). Postprocedural venous duplex ultrasound was performed to evaluate for EHIT and recanalization at 3 to 7 days, every 3 months for the first year, and every 6 to 12 months thereafter. JMP version 14 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC) was used for all statistical analysis.
Results:
EHIT was found to have developed in 186 patients; 109 patients had been treated with RFA and 77 with EVLA. The average age of the patients receiving EVLA in whom EHIT developed was 59.97 ± 11.61 years. The patients who received RFA and in whom EHIT developed had an average age of 73.4 ± 9.64 years. The average time of resolution for the EVLA group was 75 ± 71.97 days. The average resolution time for the RFA group was 139.8 ± 232.52 days. There were no statistical differences between EHIT resolution times and age, sex, body mass index, clinical class, laterality, type of vein treated, or whether the patient was taking clopidogrel preoperatively or postoperatively. A statistical difference was found between EHIT resolution time and whether the patient was treated with EVLA or RFA (P = .0332).
Conclusions:
Our study seems to suggest that EHIT resolution times may be related to the difference in treatment modality between EVLA and RFA. The data suggest that EHIT resolves more quickly with the use of EVLA than with RFA.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
Venous Thrombosis I: Introduction
Venous Thrombosis II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Venous Thrombosis IV: Nursing Management
Varicose Veins II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Anticoagulant Drugs: Low-Molecular-Weight Heparins

